User Submitted Plans
This table represents suggested map changes submitted by the public.
IRC Plan Name | Submitted Plan Name | Plan Type | Plan Description | Plan Objective |
---|---|---|---|---|
CD0001 | 9CD-RS Self |
Congressional | Testing out a 9 CD map |
Nothing in particular. Attempted to create different rural CDs |
CD0001 | 9CD-RS Self |
Congressional | Testing out a 9 CD map |
Nothing in particular. Attempted to create different rural CDs |
CD0002 | 2 Rural 1 Ultra Hispanic 1 Rich 1 Tucson Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map gives the hispanic population of Maricopa a unified voice. It also gives rural Maricopans a unified voice in North and South divisions. Finally, the map gives the East Valley a unified voice and unifies Central Phoenix's unique culture with the university areas. 1. Give rural Arizona a unified voice that isn't subject to urban voters in Maricopa or Pima. 2. Give Tucson a unified voice 3 |
1. This district is a wealth-focused district that is known for long commute times and deeply suburban lifestyles. 2. This district is Northern and Eastern Arizona. It is a large district that shares a history in its Mormon roots. It contains most of Arizona's religious farming communities and mining towns. 3. This district is a district hyper-focused on the Maricopa Hispanic population. The |
CD0002 | 2 Rural 1 Ultra Hispanic 1 Rich 1 Tucson Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map gives the hispanic population of Maricopa a unified voice. It also gives rural Maricopans a unified voice in North and South divisions. Finally, the map gives the East Valley a unified voice and unifies Central Phoenix's unique culture with the university areas. 1. Give rural Arizona a unified voice that isn't subject to urban voters in Maricopa or Pima. 2. Give Tucson a unified voice 3 |
1. This district is a wealth-focused district that is known for long commute times and deeply suburban lifestyles. 2. This district is Northern and Eastern Arizona. It is a large district that shares a history in its Mormon roots. It contains most of Arizona's religious farming communities and mining towns. 3. This district is a district hyper-focused on the Maricopa Hispanic population. The |
CD0003 | Native Unification Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map unites most native tribes in Arizona to one district. It creates another rural district that consists of Snowflake, Prescott, Sedona, Graham County, Greenlee County, Cochise County, Santa Cruz County, and the rural parts of Pima county. There is a semi-rural district that combines rural-esque suburbs of Phoenix with Prescott. It creates a hispanic-focused district in the Southwest of |
This map creates a district (1) focused on uniting most Native American lands in the state. It also includes Yuma and the I17 communities. District 2 gives Tucson a unified voice. It is close to the 5% limit as it ought to include as much of the Tucson exurbs as possible. District 3 is a rural district combining Greenlee, Cochise, and Graham counties with the rural parts of Pima and Pinal, the |
CD0003 | Native Unification Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map unites most native tribes in Arizona to one district. It creates another rural district that consists of Snowflake, Prescott, Sedona, Graham County, Greenlee County, Cochise County, Santa Cruz County, and the rural parts of Pima county. There is a semi-rural district that combines rural-esque suburbs of Phoenix with Prescott. It creates a hispanic-focused district in the Southwest of |
This map creates a district (1) focused on uniting most Native American lands in the state. It also includes Yuma and the I17 communities. District 2 gives Tucson a unified voice. It is close to the 5% limit as it ought to include as much of the Tucson exurbs as possible. District 3 is a rural district combining Greenlee, Cochise, and Graham counties with the rural parts of Pima and Pinal, the |
CD0004 | Arizona 9 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map is designed to make the best congressional districts using COIs. It contains one Northern Arizona district that takes in the counties that cover the Colorado Plateau including Prescott, Flagstaff, the Grand Canyon and similar national park areas. The Maricopa districts are mostly the same as the current map and combine different cities in the East and West Valley's. There is one majority |
To combine communities of interest to make the best map possible for Arizona |
CD0004 | Arizona 9 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map is designed to make the best congressional districts using COIs. It contains one Northern Arizona district that takes in the counties that cover the Colorado Plateau including Prescott, Flagstaff, the Grand Canyon and similar national park areas. The Maricopa districts are mostly the same as the current map and combine different cities in the East and West Valley's. There is one majority |
To combine communities of interest to make the best map possible for Arizona |
CD0005 | Arizona Congressional Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This Congressional Plan is a proposed fair map. There are two minority-majority districts. Native American tribal boundaries are respected. There is a simple northern AZ district, one anchored by the rapidly growing Pinal Co, two covering southern AZ, and five for Maricopa County. |
CD0005 | Arizona Congressional Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This Congressional Plan is a proposed fair map. There are two minority-majority districts. Native American tribal boundaries are respected. There is a simple northern AZ district, one anchored by the rapidly growing Pinal Co, two covering southern AZ, and five for Maricopa County. |
CD0006 | AZ Congressional Map - City Population - Version 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | 1) In this map the Phoenix metro area encompasses 5 congressional districts. The area was chosen using roughly the largest cities in Maricopa County and a total population of roughly 5*794611 or 3,973,055 people. |
Maricopa county is large enough to have 5 congressional districts completely contained but the default grid map algorithm didn't do this. Using new census data I totaled city populations in the Phoenix Metro area and created a minimal sized area that would encompass enough residents to fill 5 districts. Please zoom to the Phoenix area to see these 5 districts which are very compact. The overall |
CD0006 | AZ Congressional Map - City Population - Version 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | 1) In this map the Phoenix metro area encompasses 5 congressional districts. The area was chosen using roughly the largest cities in Maricopa County and a total population of roughly 5*794611 or 3,973,055 people. |
Maricopa county is large enough to have 5 congressional districts completely contained but the default grid map algorithm didn't do this. Using new census data I totaled city populations in the Phoenix Metro area and created a minimal sized area that would encompass enough residents to fill 5 districts. Please zoom to the Phoenix area to see these 5 districts which are very compact. The overall |
CD0007 | Lucas's Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
I tried to make all the districts more compact. The current map and starting point map chops up Northern AZ and throws that voting population into the same district as voting populations in central and southern AZ. Doesn't make much sense that someone in Page votes in the same congressional district as someone in Wilcox. |
CD0007 | Lucas's Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
I tried to make all the districts more compact. The current map and starting point map chops up Northern AZ and throws that voting population into the same district as voting populations in central and southern AZ. Doesn't make much sense that someone in Page votes in the same congressional district as someone in Wilcox. |
CD0008 | AZ House - 2 out of 3 - V1a Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | 2 out of 3 people in Arizona live in the greater Pheonix metro area. In this plan I have isolated all of norther Maricopa County and part of Pinal County as the 'Greater Pheonix Metro Area'. Within this area are 6 or Arizona's 9 US Congressional seats. |
2 out of 3 people in Arizona live in the greater Phoenix metro area and therefore should have 6 US Congressional seats that represent them. In this plan these are districts 1-6. Districts 7-9 represent the 1 out of 3 Arizonan's that live outside that area with 2 in the south and 1 in the north. PlanScore suggests this map is 'balanced'. |
CD0008 | AZ House - 2 out of 3 - V1a Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | 2 out of 3 people in Arizona live in the greater Pheonix metro area. In this plan I have isolated all of norther Maricopa County and part of Pinal County as the 'Greater Pheonix Metro Area'. Within this area are 6 or Arizona's 9 US Congressional seats. |
2 out of 3 people in Arizona live in the greater Phoenix metro area and therefore should have 6 US Congressional seats that represent them. In this plan these are districts 1-6. Districts 7-9 represent the 1 out of 3 Arizonan's that live outside that area with 2 in the south and 1 in the north. PlanScore suggests this map is 'balanced'. |
CD0009 | Arizona Congressional Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a map of the nine congressional districts that addresses some community of interest issues in Southern Arizona. The districts in Maricopa County may or may not be relevant as presented. |
This plan addresses some COI issues in Southern Arizona. It follows the current maps to some degree which I believe are fair and competitive. |
CD0009 | Arizona Congressional Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a map of the nine congressional districts that addresses some community of interest issues in Southern Arizona. The districts in Maricopa County may or may not be relevant as presented. |
This plan addresses some COI issues in Southern Arizona. It follows the current maps to some degree which I believe are fair and competitive. |
CD0010 | Congressional Pima and Pinal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | District 6 and 5 |
To keep counties together and to limit the territory covered in Districts 2 and 9 |
CD0010 | Congressional Pima and Pinal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | District 6 and 5 |
To keep counties together and to limit the territory covered in Districts 2 and 9 |
CD0011 | Master COI Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0011 | Master COI Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0012 | Congressional Trail Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | In this plan, District 2 and 9 were separated along the Mogollon rim more evenly. While cleaning up other districts to fit as best as possible to major roads or county lines. |
In this plan, I tried to divide district 9 and district 2 more alone county and by the Mogollon rim. The grand canyon has been added to district 2. I also tried to make district 2 not sprawl to every side of the state. I think overall this cleaned up the borders of each district. |
CD0012 | Congressional Trail Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | In this plan, District 2 and 9 were separated along the Mogollon rim more evenly. While cleaning up other districts to fit as best as possible to major roads or county lines. |
In this plan, I tried to divide district 9 and district 2 more alone county and by the Mogollon rim. The grand canyon has been added to district 2. I also tried to make district 2 not sprawl to every side of the state. I think overall this cleaned up the borders of each district. |
CD0013 | CD Plan 9-29-2021 - MAS SELF |
Congressional | N/A |
Improve the concept of communities of interest |
CD0013 | CD Plan 9-29-2021 - MAS SELF |
Congressional | N/A |
Improve the concept of communities of interest |
CD0014 | 5001.plan Sonoit/Elgin |
Congressional | N/A |
Community of Interest. Extends CD 2 boundary to the West to include Sonoita/Elgin and to the South to the southern border. |
CD0014 | 5001.plan Sonoit/Elgin |
Congressional | N/A |
Community of Interest. Extends CD 2 boundary to the West to include Sonoita/Elgin and to the South to the southern border. |
CD0015 | FireBladeX59 AZ CD Plan 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0015 | FireBladeX59 AZ CD Plan 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0016 | Coconino - Congressional District Draft Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map’s focus is on Congressional District (“CD”) 2. All the districts have been balanced within the +/- 5% deviation. The map follows the guidelines of Prop 106. It protects several communities of interest. The map is designed to protect rural communities and therefore takes into account the rural nature of the communities comprising CD 2. It also maintains the national monuments that are |
CD 2 adds the copper and cattle communities of interest (Globe, Superior, Kearny and parts of Casa Grande). Interest was expressed in the copper and cattle communities to be included in the rural district. CD 2 pays particular attention to the Native American population. It includes not only the Navajo Nation but also the Hopi, Yavapai Apache, San Carlos Apache, Tonto Apache, Zuni, Havasupai, San |
CD0016 | Coconino - Congressional District Draft Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map’s focus is on Congressional District (“CD”) 2. All the districts have been balanced within the +/- 5% deviation. The map follows the guidelines of Prop 106. It protects several communities of interest. The map is designed to protect rural communities and therefore takes into account the rural nature of the communities comprising CD 2. It also maintains the national monuments that are |
CD 2 adds the copper and cattle communities of interest (Globe, Superior, Kearny and parts of Casa Grande). Interest was expressed in the copper and cattle communities to be included in the rural district. CD 2 pays particular attention to the Native American population. It includes not only the Navajo Nation but also the Hopi, Yavapai Apache, San Carlos Apache, Tonto Apache, Zuni, Havasupai, San |
CD0017 | FBX59 AZ CD Plan 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0017 | FBX59 AZ CD Plan 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0018 | OldendorphCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Met requirements for population, compactness, contiguious, community of interest and meeting the Arizona State constitution and Arizona IRC> |
CD0018 | OldendorphCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Met requirements for population, compactness, contiguious, community of interest and meeting the Arizona State constitution and Arizona IRC> |
CD0019 | Ready for SECTION 14 F Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a proposed Redistricting Map for the Arizona Congressional Districts. Based on comments made by Commissioner Neuberg, I ignored the Commission Adopted Grid Map and substituted my map which is composed of actual grids and which recognizes mountain and desert areas as well as rural and urban areas with the addition of a Tucson area District. I call my Redistricting Map as “Ready for SECTION |
My map respects Native American Community boundaries, County Lines, and City and Town limits to the extent possible within population constraints. None of the 21 Native American Community are split and all are included in Districts one, two and three. My major concern is compliance with the Voting Rights Act which was passed to protect the rights of African-American voters which is not an issue in |
CD0019 | Ready for SECTION 14 F Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a proposed Redistricting Map for the Arizona Congressional Districts. Based on comments made by Commissioner Neuberg, I ignored the Commission Adopted Grid Map and substituted my map which is composed of actual grids and which recognizes mountain and desert areas as well as rural and urban areas with the addition of a Tucson area District. I call my Redistricting Map as “Ready for SECTION |
My map respects Native American Community boundaries, County Lines, and City and Town limits to the extent possible within population constraints. None of the 21 Native American Community are split and all are included in Districts one, two and three. My major concern is compliance with the Voting Rights Act which was passed to protect the rights of African-American voters which is not an issue in |
CD0020 | Ready for SECTION 14 F V2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a proposed Redistricting Map for the Arizona Congressional Districts. Based on comments made by Commissioner Neuberg, I ignored the Commission Adopted Grid Map and substituted my map which is composed of actual grids and which recognizes mountain and desert areas as well as rural and urban areas with the addition of a Tucson area District. I call my Redistricting Map as “Ready for SECTION |
My map respects Native American Community boundaries, County Lines, and City and Town limits to the extent possible within population constraints. None of the 21 Native American Community are split and all are included in Districts one, two and three. My major concern is compliance with the Voting Rights Act which was passed to protect the rights of African-American voters which is not an issue in |
CD0020 | Ready for SECTION 14 F V2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a proposed Redistricting Map for the Arizona Congressional Districts. Based on comments made by Commissioner Neuberg, I ignored the Commission Adopted Grid Map and substituted my map which is composed of actual grids and which recognizes mountain and desert areas as well as rural and urban areas with the addition of a Tucson area District. I call my Redistricting Map as “Ready for SECTION |
My map respects Native American Community boundaries, County Lines, and City and Town limits to the extent possible within population constraints. None of the 21 Native American Community are split and all are included in Districts one, two and three. My major concern is compliance with the Voting Rights Act which was passed to protect the rights of African-American voters which is not an issue in |
CD0021 | Test1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This map consolidates the rural communities of interest that is more conducive to our culture and heritage. the counties to the East have a different viewpoint on water and land use. |
CD0021 | Test1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This map consolidates the rural communities of interest that is more conducive to our culture and heritage. the counties to the East have a different viewpoint on water and land use. |
CD0022 | Schaum Proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
-Keep Communities of Interest Intact -Comply with the VRA -Partisan Fairness: The median district is nearly perfectly aligned with the partisan composition of the state.-Promote competition: 3 out of 9 districts are highly competitive. |
CD0022 | Schaum Proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
-Keep Communities of Interest Intact -Comply with the VRA -Partisan Fairness: The median district is nearly perfectly aligned with the partisan composition of the state.-Promote competition: 3 out of 9 districts are highly competitive. |
CD0023 | Congressional Districts - WBeard Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Communities of Interest - focusing on Southern Arizona Representation. |
9 Congressional districts with a strong emphasis on communities of interest. |
CD0023 | Congressional Districts - WBeard Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Communities of Interest - focusing on Southern Arizona Representation. |
9 Congressional districts with a strong emphasis on communities of interest. |
CD0024 | KTB Congressional Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This map recognizes the communities of interest of northern AZ and maintains the rural benefits. We should not be part of Maricopa, which is metropolitan. |
CD0024 | KTB Congressional Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This map recognizes the communities of interest of northern AZ and maintains the rural benefits. We should not be part of Maricopa, which is metropolitan. |
CD0025 | Balanced CD Map - Full State Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to |
Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to |
CD0025 | Balanced CD Map - Full State Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to |
Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to |
CD0026 | Yavapai-Apache Nation Congressional Map CD2 Yavapai-Apache Nation |
Congressional | This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation regarding its preferred congressional district lines for Congressional District 2. |
This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation to the IRC in the Grid Maps phase of the redistricting process. This map is exclusively focused on Congressional District 2, which would include the Yavapai-Apache Nation, as well as 11 other federally recognized tribes, emphasizing tribal and rural communities of interest and competitiveness of the district overall. The other districts in the |
CD0026 | Yavapai-Apache Nation Congressional Map CD2 Yavapai-Apache Nation |
Congressional | This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation regarding its preferred congressional district lines for Congressional District 2. |
This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation to the IRC in the Grid Maps phase of the redistricting process. This map is exclusively focused on Congressional District 2, which would include the Yavapai-Apache Nation, as well as 11 other federally recognized tribes, emphasizing tribal and rural communities of interest and competitiveness of the district overall. The other districts in the |
CD0027 | CDplanOctober Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This plan provides 5 seats along the Colorado River and 3 along the International Boarder with Mexico. All Districts are compact, contigous and represent communities of interest. |
CD0027 | CDplanOctober Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This plan provides 5 seats along the Colorado River and 3 along the International Boarder with Mexico. All Districts are compact, contigous and represent communities of interest. |
CD0028 | CD 2 Extension Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Extends CD2 boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita,Elgin and Canelo. Does not include Patagonia. |
Extends CD2 boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and part of the San Raphael Valley - all the way to the international border. |
CD0028 | CD 2 Extension Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Extends CD2 boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita,Elgin and Canelo. Does not include Patagonia. |
Extends CD2 boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and part of the San Raphael Valley - all the way to the international border. |
CD0029 | 2021 Redistricting Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Separate by Geographic Areas and City Boundaries: 1. North Phoenix, 2. Scottsdale/Tempe/Mesa, 3. South Phoenix, 4. East Valley (Chandler, Gilbert) 5. South East Arizona, 6. City of Tucson, 7. South West Arizona. 8. West Valley (Glendale, Avondale, Goodyear, Surprise), 9. Northern Arizona. |
CD0029 | 2021 Redistricting Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Separate by Geographic Areas and City Boundaries: 1. North Phoenix, 2. Scottsdale/Tempe/Mesa, 3. South Phoenix, 4. East Valley (Chandler, Gilbert) 5. South East Arizona, 6. City of Tucson, 7. South West Arizona. 8. West Valley (Glendale, Avondale, Goodyear, Surprise), 9. Northern Arizona. |
CD0030 | P Cochran Map 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Keep geographic regions together, keep cities and towns together and grouped with similar Cities and towns. Split into congressional districts into easily understood areas: Tucson, North Phoenix, South Phoenix, West Valley, Chandler/Gilbert, and Scottsdale/Mesa/Tempe. |
The congressional map should keep similar geographic areas together and take into consideration natural or man made barriers. |
CD0030 | P Cochran Map 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Keep geographic regions together, keep cities and towns together and grouped with similar Cities and towns. Split into congressional districts into easily understood areas: Tucson, North Phoenix, South Phoenix, West Valley, Chandler/Gilbert, and Scottsdale/Mesa/Tempe. |
The congressional map should keep similar geographic areas together and take into consideration natural or man made barriers. |
CD0031 | Communities of Interest BALANCED Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This is a balanced map that fulfils all 6 requirements. The Communities of Interest are taken into account with extreme care and scrutiny. This district keeps rural areas together and urban areas together. It keeps common communities with one another while refusing to sacrifice geographic or cultural boundaries. |
CD0031 | Communities of Interest BALANCED Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This is a balanced map that fulfils all 6 requirements. The Communities of Interest are taken into account with extreme care and scrutiny. This district keeps rural areas together and urban areas together. It keeps common communities with one another while refusing to sacrifice geographic or cultural boundaries. |
CD0032 | EqualAZ Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This plan gets every District in the 0.00% margin. |
Every district is 0.00% with at most +/- 3 votes. The district lines are sensible, natural barriers. |
CD0032 | EqualAZ Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This plan gets every District in the 0.00% margin. |
Every district is 0.00% with at most +/- 3 votes. The district lines are sensible, natural barriers. |
CD0033 | Fair congressional redistricting proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | A map with 4 competitive seats, as well as having a 1/5th native district and 2 majority hispanic districts. |
This map was created based off the maps proposed by the commission earlier today. It aims to keep a Native opportunity district (District 1 on the 2011 map) that can elect a representative of their choice. This map also has 4 competitive districts won by under 5% in 2020. Districts 1, 2, 6, and 8. Of those Biden won District 2 and 6, while Trump won 1 and 8. As the 2011 map did, this map attempts |
CD0033 | Fair congressional redistricting proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | A map with 4 competitive seats, as well as having a 1/5th native district and 2 majority hispanic districts. |
This map was created based off the maps proposed by the commission earlier today. It aims to keep a Native opportunity district (District 1 on the 2011 map) that can elect a representative of their choice. This map also has 4 competitive districts won by under 5% in 2020. Districts 1, 2, 6, and 8. Of those Biden won District 2 and 6, while Trump won 1 and 8. As the 2011 map did, this map attempts |
CD0034 | AZCongress#2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Arizona census 2020 Hispanic 30.7% Black 5% Native American 5% 3 districts with Hispanic majority population (#1, #3, #7). All 3 have minority populations (Hispanic, Black and Native American )over 60%. |
CD0034 | AZCongress#2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
Arizona census 2020 Hispanic 30.7% Black 5% Native American 5% 3 districts with Hispanic majority population (#1, #3, #7). All 3 have minority populations (Hispanic, Black and Native American )over 60%. |
CD0035 | Raghu CD 2.2 Deviations More Competetive Resident of Chandler. No org |
Congressional | I moved some precincts around to CD 2 to move GRIC and AK CHIN in same CD as Navajo Nation, HOPI, San Carlos, White Mountain, Hualapai etc. |
I made Gila River IC and Ak Chin community join the other Native american tribes in CD2. Had to move around some precincts outside Prescott into CD9 to achieve balance. |
CD0035 | Raghu-CD 2.2 Deviations More Competetive Resident of Chandler. No org |
Congressional | I moved some precincts around to CD 2 to move GRIC and AK CHIN in same CD as Navajo Nation, HOPI, San Carlos, White Mountain, Hualapai etc. |
I made Gila River IC and Ak Chin community join the other Native american tribes in CD2. Had to move around some precincts outside Prescott into CD9 to achieve balance. |
CD0036 | Fair Compact Congressional Map with 5 Competitive CDs Not affiliated with any organization |
Congressional | Creates a fair compact congressional map with 5 congressional CDs. This map is compliant with the DRA. |
-Promote competition. -VRA compliance. -Create a fair and compact CD2 that is nearly perfectly aligned with the partisan lean of the state to elevate the voicea Native Americans and rural Arizonans. -Create a competitive district in Tucson. -Create 3 competitive districts in the Phoenix area. |
CD0036 | Fair Compact Congressional Map with 5 Competitive CDs Not affiliated with any organization |
Congressional | Creates a fair compact congressional map with 5 congressional CDs. This map is compliant with the DRA. |
-Promote competition. -VRA compliance. -Create a fair and compact CD2 that is nearly perfectly aligned with the partisan lean of the state to elevate the voicea Native Americans and rural Arizonans. -Create a competitive district in Tucson. -Create 3 competitive districts in the Phoenix area. |
CD0037 | Congressional Districts Even Thrawn Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map strives to make as many districts with a partisan rating of EVEN as possible, without splitting up communities. |
To create as many districts as possible with a partisan rating of EVEN, while not splitting up communities. |
CD0037 | Congressional Districts Even Thrawn Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map strives to make as many districts with a partisan rating of EVEN as possible, without splitting up communities. |
To create as many districts as possible with a partisan rating of EVEN, while not splitting up communities. |
CD0038 | AZ CD Map - Version 3.0 Proposal Private Citizen |
Congressional | Attempting to address what I'm hearing live in the 10/15 meeting as of 2PM |
This map attempts to give the border counties representation as well as address the other issues I'm hearing live in the meeting. |
CD0038 | AZ CD Map - Version 3.0 Proposal Private Citizen |
Congressional | Attempting to address what I'm hearing live in the 10/15 meeting as of 2PM |
This map attempts to give the border counties representation as well as address the other issues I'm hearing live in the meeting. |
CD0039 | Raghu-Version2-BalancedMaps None - chandler resident |
Congressional | Puts GRIC, Ak Chin, Guadalupe (Pascua Yaqui) in along with other tribal groups |
Just trying to put GRIC, Ak Chin and Guadalupe (Pascua Yaqui), and Salt River and Fort McDowell communities along with other Indian communities. |
CD0039 | Raghu-Version2-BalancedMaps None - chandler resident |
Congressional | Puts GRIC, Ak Chin, Guadalupe (Pascua Yaqui) in along with other tribal groups |
Just trying to put GRIC, Ak Chin and Guadalupe (Pascua Yaqui), and Salt River and Fort McDowell communities along with other Indian communities. |
CD0040 | Ari - Abe 3.X Map |
Congressional | ||
CD0040 | Ari - Abe 3.X Map |
Congressional | ||
CD0041 | Matt Siegel Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | All districts nearly at provided D/R rate |
Keeps all districts at close to statewide competitiveness between Democrats and Republicans |
CD0041 | Matt Siegel Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | All districts nearly at provided D/R rate |
Keeps all districts at close to statewide competitiveness between Democrats and Republicans |
CD0042 | RJF 18Oct21 LD 17 Resident |
Congressional | LD 17 Resident. Align East Valley and Tucson district around major thoroughfares. |
Eliminate staggered boundaries from last plan via alignment around major thoroughfares. Minimize number of districts with majorities above 60%. |
CD0042 | RJF_18Oct21 LD 17 Resident |
Congressional | LD 17 Resident. Align East Valley and Tucson district around major thoroughfares. |
Eliminate staggered boundaries from last plan via alignment around major thoroughfares. Minimize number of districts with majorities above 60%. |
CD0043 | AZ CD 4.2 to 5.0 Proposal Citizen |
Congressional | This map improves the compactness scores of Districts 2, 6 & 7 and makes Districts 6 & 7 more competitive. It significantly reduces county splits and honors Graham and Greenlee counties rural nature by linking them to counties with more in common. No other districts were touched. |
This map improves the compactness scores of Districts 2, 6 & 7 and makes Districts 6 & 7 more competitive. It significantly reduces county splits and honors Graham and Greenlee counties rural nature by linking them to counties with more in common. |
CD0043 | AZ CD 4.2 to 5.0 Proposal Citizen |
Congressional | This map improves the compactness scores of Districts 2, 6 & 7 and makes Districts 6 & 7 more competitive. It significantly reduces county splits and honors Graham and Greenlee counties rural nature by linking them to counties with more in common. No other districts were touched. |
This map improves the compactness scores of Districts 2, 6 & 7 and makes Districts 6 & 7 more competitive. It significantly reduces county splits and honors Graham and Greenlee counties rural nature by linking them to counties with more in common. |
CD0044 | Ari - Abe 4.X Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Abraham Farooqui & Ari Bradshaw |
For the full description in an easier format, you can click this link: |
CD0044 | Ari - Abe 4.X Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Abraham Farooqui & Ari Bradshaw |
For the full description in an easier format, you can click this link: |
CD0045 | Raghu-4.1-Variation None- chandler resident |
Congressional | Made a competitive CD 2 |
Made a competitive CD around the Northern Tribes. You cannot have someone like Wendy Rogers / Paul Gosar representing the Northern Tribes. Sorry to be blunt. You at least need someone like Jeff Flake mould. |
CD0045 | Raghu-4.1-Variation None- chandler resident |
Congressional | Made a competitive CD 2 |
Made a competitive CD around the Northern Tribes. You cannot have someone like Wendy Rogers / Paul Gosar representing the Northern Tribes. Sorry to be blunt. You at least need someone like Jeff Flake mould. |
CD0046 | AZ CD 5.1 Draft Map Compactness and Competitiveness Proposals Citizen |
Congressional | I started with the CD 5.1 Draft Map. I would have used 5.2 or 5.3 but both were broken for discontiguous areas and population issues. I modified CD 5.1 for higher competitiveness and compactness scores. The map reads very balanced in PlanScore. |
I started with the CD 5.1 Draft Map. I would have used 5.2 or 5.3 but both were broken for discontiguous areas and population issues. I modified CD 5.1 for higher competitiveness and compactness scores. The map reads very balanced in PlanScore. |
CD0046 | AZ CD 5.1 Draft Map Compactness and Competitiveness Proposals Citizen |
Congressional | I started with the CD 5.1 Draft Map. I would have used 5.2 or 5.3 but both were broken for discontiguous areas and population issues. I modified CD 5.1 for higher competitiveness and compactness scores. The map reads very balanced in PlanScore. |
I started with the CD 5.1 Draft Map. I would have used 5.2 or 5.3 but both were broken for discontiguous areas and population issues. I modified CD 5.1 for higher competitiveness and compactness scores. The map reads very balanced in PlanScore. |
CD0047 | Stuart Hepworth Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Not an Arizona resident, just someone who follows redistricting across the country. My plan has a 5-4 Democratic split in 2020, has four highly competitive districts, preserves the cores of prior districts, and has two majority hispanic districts and one majority non-white district. |
Not an Arizona resident, just someone who follows redistricting across the country. My plan has a 5-4 Democratic split in 2020, has four highly competitive districts, preserves the cores of prior districts, and has two majority hispanic districts and one majority non-white district. It also doesn't divide any Native American reservations, and puts almost all of them into one district to maximize |
CD0047 | Stuart Hepworth Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Not an Arizona resident, just someone who follows redistricting across the country. My plan has a 5-4 Democratic split in 2020, has four highly competitive districts, preserves the cores of prior districts, and has two majority hispanic districts and one majority non-white district. |
Not an Arizona resident, just someone who follows redistricting across the country. My plan has a 5-4 Democratic split in 2020, has four highly competitive districts, preserves the cores of prior districts, and has two majority hispanic districts and one majority non-white district. It also doesn't divide any Native American reservations, and puts almost all of them into one district to maximize |
CD0048 | Raghu-5.3Variations Chandler Resident - No Org |
Congressional | Fixing and balancing 5.3 map |
I balanced your 5.3 map by population. Also we have 4 Swing CDs this way. CD1,2,6,8. 1,6 are D leaning While 2,8 are R leaning. Enjoy |
CD0048 | Raghu-5.3Variations Chandler Resident - No Org |
Congressional | Fixing and balancing 5.3 map |
I balanced your 5.3 map by population. Also we have 4 Swing CDs this way. CD1,2,6,8. 1,6 are D leaning While 2,8 are R leaning. Enjoy |
CD0049 | Brian Bickel revision of CD5.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | These changes eliminate the crab claw going up into Pinal county, reduces population variance, leaves one solid Republican, one solid Democrat, one lean Republican, one lean Democrat and five competitive districts. |
Reduces population variance, eliminates crab claw into Pinal county and increases competitiveness. |
CD0049 | Brian Bickel revision of CD5.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | These changes eliminate the crab claw going up into Pinal county, reduces population variance, leaves one solid Republican, one solid Democrat, one lean Republican, one lean Democrat and five competitive districts. |
Reduces population variance, eliminates crab claw into Pinal county and increases competitiveness. |
CD0050 | Ari Abe 6.X Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Gave Graham and Greenlee to D2. Gave all of San Tan to D5 and spiralled from there. Gave all of the radically different part of downtown to D1 from D3. |
Dear Commission, Mappers, Lawyers, and Public: |
CD0050 | Ari Abe 6.X Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Gave Graham and Greenlee to D2. Gave all of San Tan to D5 and spiralled from there. Gave all of the radically different part of downtown to D1 from D3. |
Dear Commission, Mappers, Lawyers, and Public: |
CD0051 | Modified CD Map 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | The areas of Arizona City/Eloy and South Casa Grande have a greater community of interest being in the same district as Marana (CD 6 on map) than with Yuma. The population balance is created by adjusting the amount of the City of Tucson within CD 7 on this map. |
The area east of Tohono reservation in Pinal County (ELoy/S Casa Grande/AZ City) have more in common with Marana than with Yuma. Population balanced in City of Tucson. Maintains more communities of interest and doesn't affect VRA requirements. |
CD0051 | Modified CD Map 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | The areas of Arizona City/Eloy and South Casa Grande have a greater community of interest being in the same district as Marana (CD 6 on map) than with Yuma. The population balance is created by adjusting the amount of the City of Tucson within CD 7 on this map. |
The area east of Tohono reservation in Pinal County (ELoy/S Casa Grande/AZ City) have more in common with Marana than with Yuma. Population balanced in City of Tucson. Maintains more communities of interest and doesn't affect VRA requirements. |
CD0052 | CD6 Change 10-22-21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Moves CD6 west boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley. Does not include the town of Patagonia. This plan aligns both CD6 and LD19 (See published plan "LD0031")with the same boundaries! |
Aligns CD6 boundaries with LD19 boundaries for eastern Santa Cruz County. See submitted plan "LD0031" for reference. |
CD0052 | CD6 Change 10-22-21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Moves CD6 west boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley. Does not include the town of Patagonia. This plan aligns both CD6 and LD19 (See published plan "LD0031")with the same boundaries! |
Aligns CD6 boundaries with LD19 boundaries for eastern Santa Cruz County. See submitted plan "LD0031" for reference. |
CD0053 | EqualAZ - CD 6.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This plan evenly distributes southeastern AZ more in line with local interests and evens out population in D2 and D9. You have a more defined SW AZ. |
This Congressional Map aligns mimics the Legislative Map. Includes the Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth area into the D6 region and evenly divides Tucson between D6 and D7. D7 becomes a desert SW focused region. D9 and D2 equally distributes population and D2 keeps tribal regions together. Phx region remains logical with natural boundaries with equal population. |
CD0053 | EqualAZ - CD 6.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This plan evenly distributes southeastern AZ more in line with local interests and evens out population in D2 and D9. You have a more defined SW AZ. |
This Congressional Map aligns mimics the Legislative Map. Includes the Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth area into the D6 region and evenly divides Tucson between D6 and D7. D7 becomes a desert SW focused region. D9 and D2 equally distributes population and D2 keeps tribal regions together. Phx region remains logical with natural boundaries with equal population. |
CD0054 | The Best CD Map Ever...Ever! Citizens for A Congressional Map that Makes Sense. |
Congressional | N/A |
This is clearly the best map that anyone can come up with. It is so straightforward and on point its like a cruise missile hitting the head of a pin. You don't have to over think this, or ask why is Flagstaff in the same district as Chandler? Or how do we get Lake Havasu to vote with people in Douglas? There are no district tentacles reaching into neighborhoods to grab specific voting blocs. Like |
CD0054 | The Best CD Map Ever...Ever! Citizens for A Congressional Map that Makes Sense. |
Congressional | N/A |
This is clearly the best map that anyone can come up with. It is so straightforward and on point its like a cruise missile hitting the head of a pin. You don't have to over think this, or ask why is Flagstaff in the same district as Chandler? Or how do we get Lake Havasu to vote with people in Douglas? There are no district tentacles reaching into neighborhoods to grab specific voting blocs. Like |
CD0055 | Update to 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Try to get rid of the fingers, thumbs, for district 9 and 6. |
N/A |
CD0055 | Update to 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Try to get rid of the fingers, thumbs, for district 9 and 6. |
N/A |
CD0056 | EqualAZ - CD 6.1 - UPDATE 10.26.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This Congressional map update accounts for Lerner's request to add New River, Cave Creek and Carefree into CD8 by adding North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. This map also keeps Mehl's request to add Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth and Saddlebrook to CD6 to mimic the LD districts. It eliminates the CD6 stretch up to Casa Grande which is unrepresentative of SE AZ. |
This Congressional map update accounts for Lerner's request to add New River, Cave Creek and Carefree into CD8 by adding North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. This map also keeps Mehl's request to add Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth and Saddlebrook to CD6 to mimic the LD districts. It eliminates the CD6 stretch up to Casa Grande which is >>VERY<< unrepresentative of SE AZ. |
CD0056 | EqualAZ - CD 6.1 - UPDATE 10.26.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This Congressional map update accounts for Lerner's request to add New River, Cave Creek and Carefree into CD8 by adding North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. This map also keeps Mehl's request to add Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth and Saddlebrook to CD6 to mimic the LD districts. It eliminates the CD6 stretch up to Casa Grande which is unrepresentative of SE AZ. |
This Congressional map update accounts for Lerner's request to add New River, Cave Creek and Carefree into CD8 by adding North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. This map also keeps Mehl's request to add Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth and Saddlebrook to CD6 to mimic the LD districts. It eliminates the CD6 stretch up to Casa Grande which is >>VERY<< unrepresentative of SE AZ. |
CD0057 | NEW Congressional Map Suggestion - 10.26.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map balances southern AZ. It does what Mehl asks keeping Marana and Oro Valley together and adds Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth, Saddlebrook into CD6. Davis Monthan AFB goes to CD7 and all of Flowing Wells District goes to CD7 as Mayor Regina Romero requests. |
This CD map balances southern AZ. It does what Mehl asks keeping entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley together and adds Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth, Saddlebrook into CD6. Davis Monthan AFB is moved to CD7 and all of Flowing Wells District goes to CD7 as Mayor Regina Romero requests. |
CD0057 | NEW Congressional Map Suggestion - 10.26.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map balances southern AZ. It does what Mehl asks keeping Marana and Oro Valley together and adds Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth, Saddlebrook into CD6. Davis Monthan AFB goes to CD7 and all of Flowing Wells District goes to CD7 as Mayor Regina Romero requests. |
This CD map balances southern AZ. It does what Mehl asks keeping entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley together and adds Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth, Saddlebrook into CD6. Davis Monthan AFB is moved to CD7 and all of Flowing Wells District goes to CD7 as Mayor Regina Romero requests. |
CD0058 | CD Map - REVISED off 6.0 - 10.27.21 - BEST! Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map fixes the CD issues. Fixes Lerner's issues and adds New River, Cave Creek and Carefree to CD8, adds North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. Mammoth, Orace, San Manuel, Saddlebrook goes back to D2 so D6 ends at Pinal County Line. Entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley are part of CD6 now. D7 pushes into Flowing Wells part of Tucson and encompasses Davis Monthan AFB. |
This map fixes the CD issues. Fixes Lerner's issues and adds New River, Cave Creek and Carefree to CD8, adds North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. Mammoth, Orace, San Manuel, Saddlebrook go back to D2 so D6 ends at Pinal County Line. Entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley are part of CD6 now. D7 pushes into Flowing Wells part of Tucson and encompasses Davis Monthan AFB now. All population |
CD0058 | CD Map - REVISED off 6.0 - 10.27.21 - BEST! Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map fixes the CD issues. Fixes Lerner's issues and adds New River, Cave Creek and Carefree to CD8, adds North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. Mammoth, Orace, San Manuel, Saddlebrook goes back to D2 so D6 ends at Pinal County Line. Entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley are part of CD6 now. D7 pushes into Flowing Wells part of Tucson and encompasses Davis Monthan AFB. |
This map fixes the CD issues. Fixes Lerner's issues and adds New River, Cave Creek and Carefree to CD8, adds North Mountain Preserve and Sunnyslope to CD1. Mammoth, Orace, San Manuel, Saddlebrook go back to D2 so D6 ends at Pinal County Line. Entire cities of Marana and Oro Valley are part of CD6 now. D7 pushes into Flowing Wells part of Tucson and encompasses Davis Monthan AFB now. All population |
CD0059 | NEW Congressional Map ALT off 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map accommodates the Navajo Nation region and lowers D2 into D6. D6 also rises above Pinal County line to include the growing far suburbs of Tucson like Red Rock, Saddlebrook, Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth with the highway as a dividing line. D6 and D7 basically split Tucson with Davis Monthan AFB as part of the Border corridor. D8 now includes New River, Carefree and Cave Creek and D1 |
This CD map based off 6.0 accommodates the Navajo Nation region and lowers D2 into D6. D6 also rises above Pinal County line to include the growing far suburbs of Tucson like Red Rock, Saddlebrook, Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth with the highway as a dividing line. D6 and D7 basically split Tucson with Davis Monthan AFB as part of the Border corridor. D8 now includes New River, Carefree and Cave |
CD0059 | NEW Congressional Map ALT off 6.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map accommodates the Navajo Nation region and lowers D2 into D6. D6 also rises above Pinal County line to include the growing far suburbs of Tucson like Red Rock, Saddlebrook, Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth with the highway as a dividing line. D6 and D7 basically split Tucson with Davis Monthan AFB as part of the Border corridor. D8 now includes New River, Carefree and Cave Creek and D1 |
This CD map based off 6.0 accommodates the Navajo Nation region and lowers D2 into D6. D6 also rises above Pinal County line to include the growing far suburbs of Tucson like Red Rock, Saddlebrook, Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth with the highway as a dividing line. D6 and D7 basically split Tucson with Davis Monthan AFB as part of the Border corridor. D8 now includes New River, Carefree and Cave |
CD0060 | Approved Draft Map Corrections in Southern Arizona None |
Congressional | The areas including Eloy/South Casa Grande/Arizona City have more in common with the remaining parts of Pinal County than with Yuma or SW Arizona. The areas of Corona de Tucson/Green Valley and Rita Ranch have historically been associated with a SE Arizona district and should remain so. These communities of interest have more in common with SE AZ than they do with SW AZ. |
The areas including Eloy/South Casa Grande/Arizona City have more in common with the remaining parts of Pinal County than with Yuma or SW Arizona. The areas of Corona de Tucson/Green Valley and Rita Ranch have historically been associated with a SE Arizona district and should remain so. These communities of interest have more in common with SE AZ than they do with SW AZ. Have included more areas |
CD0060 | Approved Draft Map Corrections in Southern Arizona None |
Congressional | The areas including Eloy/South Casa Grande/Arizona City have more in common with the remaining parts of Pinal County than with Yuma or SW Arizona. The areas of Corona de Tucson/Green Valley and Rita Ranch have historically been associated with a SE Arizona district and should remain so. These communities of interest have more in common with SE AZ than they do with SW AZ. |
The areas including Eloy/South Casa Grande/Arizona City have more in common with the remaining parts of Pinal County than with Yuma or SW Arizona. The areas of Corona de Tucson/Green Valley and Rita Ranch have historically been associated with a SE Arizona district and should remain so. These communities of interest have more in common with SE AZ than they do with SW AZ. Have included more areas |
CD0061 | Fair CD6 and CD7 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Tucson is only entitled to one CD to represent it's urban communities of interest based on a population of around 600K. It belongs largely in the same CD as the rest of district 7, including native american and minority communities of interest that share similar concerns and should not be separated. |
This plan satisfies the legal requirements and gives fair representation to the various communities of interest. It give the city of Tucson a single CD, which is all it is entitled to given a population less than 800K. It keeps minority communities together and puts urban communities with urban and rural and suburban communities together. |
CD0061 | Fair CD6 and CD7 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Tucson is only entitled to one CD to represent it's urban communities of interest based on a population of around 600K. It belongs largely in the same CD as the rest of district 7, including native american and minority communities of interest that share similar concerns and should not be separated. |
This plan satisfies the legal requirements and gives fair representation to the various communities of interest. It give the city of Tucson a single CD, which is all it is entitled to given a population less than 800K. It keeps minority communities together and puts urban communities with urban and rural and suburban communities together. |
CD0062 | Congressional Map Based off 1.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map works better for southeastern AZ, specifically D6. And this maps is based on natural boundaries and similar communities and regions. |
This CD map eliminates the snake finger of CD6 stretching into Pinal County to get Casa Grande. It works better for southeastern AZ. And this map is based on natural boundaries like rivers or freeways or roads keeping communities and regions together in simple logical shapes. |
CD0062 | Congressional Map Based off 1.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This CD map works better for southeastern AZ, specifically D6. And this maps is based on natural boundaries and similar communities and regions. |
This CD map eliminates the snake finger of CD6 stretching into Pinal County to get Casa Grande. It works better for southeastern AZ. And this map is based on natural boundaries like rivers or freeways or roads keeping communities and regions together in simple logical shapes. |
CD0063 | CD Map Fixes to comply with Mayor Romero Requests Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Applies the comments from Mayor Romero of Tucson regarding placing Tucson within the SW Arizona District #7. Balances this by including areas of SE Pima County and Santa Cruz to maintain communities of interest and balance population. Maintains competitiveness and VRA compliance. |
Corrects approved CD map to comply with the requests of Mayor Romero regarding the City of Tucson be included with D7. Uses River Rd and Pantano Creek as northern and eastern boundaries of D7. Balances population by adding communities of interest in SE Pima County (Green Valley/Corona de Tucson/Sahurita) and northern/eastern Santa Cruz County. Places David Monthan AFB inside D6 to comply with |
CD0063 | CD Map Fixes to comply with Mayor Romero Requests Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Applies the comments from Mayor Romero of Tucson regarding placing Tucson within the SW Arizona District #7. Balances this by including areas of SE Pima County and Santa Cruz to maintain communities of interest and balance population. Maintains competitiveness and VRA compliance. |
Corrects approved CD map to comply with the requests of Mayor Romero regarding the City of Tucson be included with D7. Uses River Rd and Pantano Creek as northern and eastern boundaries of D7. Balances population by adding communities of interest in SE Pima County (Green Valley/Corona de Tucson/Sahurita) and northern/eastern Santa Cruz County. Places David Monthan AFB inside D6 to comply with |
CD0064 | EVEN Congressional Districts - 11.7.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | The point of this Congressional Map is to not only even distribute population in each district...but makes EVERY district competitive for both Democrats and Republicans. There are no districts that lean to one party with massive numbers. Every district is within the 50% vs 40%ish distribution making each district COMPETITIVE by party. Some are only 1-5% difference. |
The point of this Congressional Map is to make EVERY district competitive for both Democrats and Republicans. There are no districts that lean to one party with massive percentages. Every district is within the 50% vs 40%ish distribution making each district extremely bipartisan and COMPETITIVE. Most districts are only 1-5% difference. This is how an "Independent" redistricting map should look. No |
CD0064 | EVEN Congressional Districts - 11.7.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | The point of this Congressional Map is to not only even distribute population in each district...but makes EVERY district competitive for both Democrats and Republicans. There are no districts that lean to one party with massive numbers. Every district is within the 50% vs 40%ish distribution making each district COMPETITIVE by party. Some are only 1-5% difference. |
The point of this Congressional Map is to make EVERY district competitive for both Democrats and Republicans. There are no districts that lean to one party with massive percentages. Every district is within the 50% vs 40%ish distribution making each district extremely bipartisan and COMPETITIVE. Most districts are only 1-5% difference. This is how an "Independent" redistricting map should look. No |
CD0065 | Congressional District V2 - 11.8.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This Congressional district includes every district to be with 10% partisan sway ensuring competitive districts. It adheres to contiguous and regional community of interests. It also keeps from breaking up native reservations and tries to maintain minority grouping. It also uses natural boundaries like freeways, highways, mountain ranges or native reservations as dividing lines (unless population |
This Congressional map has every district to be almost with 10% partisan sway (with many less than that) ensuring competitive districts. It adheres to contiguous and regional community of interests. It also keeps from breaking up native reservations and maintains minority grouping. It also uses natural boundaries like freeways, highways, mountain ranges or native reservations as dividing lines |
CD0065 | Congressional District V2 - 11.8.21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This Congressional district includes every district to be with 10% partisan sway ensuring competitive districts. It adheres to contiguous and regional community of interests. It also keeps from breaking up native reservations and tries to maintain minority grouping. It also uses natural boundaries like freeways, highways, mountain ranges or native reservations as dividing lines (unless population |
This Congressional map has every district to be almost with 10% partisan sway (with many less than that) ensuring competitive districts. It adheres to contiguous and regional community of interests. It also keeps from breaking up native reservations and maintains minority grouping. It also uses natural boundaries like freeways, highways, mountain ranges or native reservations as dividing lines |
CD0066 | City of Tucson CD map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map respects the Constitution, populations, continuity, communities of interest and competitiveness. Additionally this map has also incorporated the desires of the City of Tucson Mayor and council to achieve a legislative seat to represent the good residents of the City of Tucson. |
This map of southern Arizona was made to respect the City of Tucson's Mayor's request to be included in the mandated Minority/Majority Congressional District. (Currently labeled District 7.) The Mayor is a strong proponent for the good citizens of the City of Tucson. |
CD0066 | City of Tucson CD map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map respects the Constitution, populations, continuity, communities of interest and competitiveness. Additionally this map has also incorporated the desires of the City of Tucson Mayor and council to achieve a legislative seat to represent the good residents of the City of Tucson. |
This map of southern Arizona was made to respect the City of Tucson's Mayor's request to be included in the mandated Minority/Majority Congressional District. (Currently labeled District 7.) The Mayor is a strong proponent for the good citizens of the City of Tucson. |
CD0067 | Ayden Young CD Recommendation No 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a CD5-centric plan. Western boundary follows Gilbert town line. Most other districts had minor changes, but all are within 1,229 of the population mean, much less than 1%. For CD5, could trade Gold Canyon for more of the south of Queen Creek. |
Adjusted CD5 western boundary to follow the Gilbert / Chandler line. Could move Gold Canyon into CD2 in exchange for south Queen Creek area. Small adjustments made to most CDs to balance populations, but all CDs are well within 1% of the goal. |
CD0067 | Ayden Young CD Recommendation No 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This is a CD5-centric plan. Western boundary follows Gilbert town line. Most other districts had minor changes, but all are within 1,229 of the population mean, much less than 1%. For CD5, could trade Gold Canyon for more of the south of Queen Creek. |
Adjusted CD5 western boundary to follow the Gilbert / Chandler line. Could move Gold Canyon into CD2 in exchange for south Queen Creek area. Small adjustments made to most CDs to balance populations, but all CDs are well within 1% of the goal. |
CD0068 | FinalCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This CD map provides rural North and Western Arizona with a common community of interest regarding our scarce water issues, and Western culture and lifestyle. It also provides for a minority-majority area in Eastern Arizona that supports our tribal areas and gives them an opportunity to be properly represented. |
CD0068 | FinalCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
This CD map provides rural North and Western Arizona with a common community of interest regarding our scarce water issues, and Western culture and lifestyle. It also provides for a minority-majority area in Eastern Arizona that supports our tribal areas and gives them an opportunity to be properly represented. |
CD0069 | AZCongRev1118 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0069 | AZCongRev1118 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | N/A |
N/A |
CD0070 | Arizona Congressional Map for Fair and Competitive Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map has been created to ensure that our Arizona districts congressional are fair and competitive. This map also ensures that Arizona's congressional districts will be contiguous, it is respectful of communities of interest, and it incorporates geographic features. |
The purpose of this map firstly is to have both fair and competitive districts, districts in Maricopa county have been drawn with this in mind. Other maps see, to be less competitive specifically in Maricopa county and this map fixes that. This map has also been drawn to respect communities of interest, to be contiguous, and to incorporate visible geographic features. |
CD0070 | Arizona Congressional Map for Fair and Competitive Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map has been created to ensure that our Arizona districts congressional are fair and competitive. This map also ensures that Arizona's congressional districts will be contiguous, it is respectful of communities of interest, and it incorporates geographic features. |
The purpose of this map firstly is to have both fair and competitive districts, districts in Maricopa county have been drawn with this in mind. Other maps see, to be less competitive specifically in Maricopa county and this map fixes that. This map has also been drawn to respect communities of interest, to be contiguous, and to incorporate visible geographic features. |
CD0071 | AFY - CD5 Proposal 2 Self |
Congressional | Places Gilbert and Queen Creek in CD5 to correct the "panhandle." Matches LD10, LD13 and LD14 boundaries with my LD Proposal 3 and LD Proposal 4. Part of LD9 is also included. |
Includes all of LD10, LD13 and LD14 and part of LD9. Makes CD5 compact and combines communities of interest in the eastern East Valley. Corrects the "panhandle" issue in central Gilbert. Matches LD boundaries in my LD Proposal 3 and LD Proposal 4. |
CD0071 | AFY - CD5 Proposal 2 Self |
Congressional | Places Gilbert and Queen Creek in CD5 to correct the "panhandle." Matches LD10, LD13 and LD14 boundaries with my LD Proposal 3 and LD Proposal 4. Part of LD9 is also included. |
Includes all of LD10, LD13 and LD14 and part of LD9. Makes CD5 compact and combines communities of interest in the eastern East Valley. Corrects the "panhandle" issue in central Gilbert. Matches LD boundaries in my LD Proposal 3 and LD Proposal 4. |
CD0072 | Trunkless elephant Self |
Congressional | N/A |
This map deals only with changes to CD6&7. It eliminates the "elephant trunk" that sticks up into Pinal County. It has negligible impact on the competitiveness of either district and makes District 6 much more compact. It also addresses a concern of Mayor Romero by keeping downtown whole and including the University of Arizona and downtown/midtown all in the same district. |
CD0072 | Trunkless elephant Self |
Congressional | N/A |
This map deals only with changes to CD6&7. It eliminates the "elephant trunk" that sticks up into Pinal County. It has negligible impact on the competitiveness of either district and makes District 6 much more compact. It also addresses a concern of Mayor Romero by keeping downtown whole and including the University of Arizona and downtown/midtown all in the same district. |
CD0073 | AZ Latino Coalition Updates from Draft Congressional Map Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional | This submission is the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting's updated Congressional Map submission. This map was created by making adjustment's to the IRC's Draft Congressional Map based on the redistricting criteria in the Arizona Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. |
This plan improves the Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Percentage (CVAP) of District 7 and makes community of interest adjustments to District 3. In addition to the VRA districts, this plan brings District 2 into the competitive range, maximizes the Native American population and brings the minority CVAP over 46%. District 6 stays in the competitive range and makes Graham County and the entire Copper |
CD0073 | AZ Latino Coalition Updates from Draft Congressional Map Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional | This submission is the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting's updated Congressional Map submission. This map was created by making adjustment's to the IRC's Draft Congressional Map based on the redistricting criteria in the Arizona Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. |
This plan improves the Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Percentage (CVAP) of District 7 and makes community of interest adjustments to District 3. In addition to the VRA districts, this plan brings District 2 into the competitive range, maximizes the Native American population and brings the minority CVAP over 46%. District 6 stays in the competitive range and makes Graham County and the entire Copper |
CD0074 | StatewideFairandCompetitiveCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map makes CD2 competitive again. Keeps Native lands together. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave for a stronger COI and leaves Verde Valley with Flagstaff for a competitive district. This map overall is more competitive and compact than the Draft Map. NO more counties are split than under Draft map. This map sets 3 Dem, 3 Rep, and 3 Competitive districts. FAIR and Competitive. |
This map brings competitiveness and fairness to Northern AZ, and AZ statewide. 3/3/3 D/R/C |
CD0074 | StatewideFairandCompetitiveCDmap Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map makes CD2 competitive again. Keeps Native lands together. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave for a stronger COI and leaves Verde Valley with Flagstaff for a competitive district. This map overall is more competitive and compact than the Draft Map. NO more counties are split than under Draft map. This map sets 3 Dem, 3 Rep, and 3 Competitive districts. FAIR and Competitive. |
This map brings competitiveness and fairness to Northern AZ, and AZ statewide. 3/3/3 D/R/C |
CD0075 | BETTER CD Map Version off - 12.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map draws straighter lines for D6 around Casa Grande. Pulls the D6/D7 boundary in Tucson to Pantano Rd (instead of going through a neighborhood) and picks up the Tucson Mnt range population outside the areas of Marana and up to the Pinal county line...and includes the shopping district in the city of Yuma to D7 for a straighter line. This also leave D6 as almost a 50/50 district. |
Please have Lerner and Mehl look at this plan. It creates a 50/50 D6 by moving D6/D7 boundary to Pantano Rd in the panhandle area. It picks up the Tucson Mnt population up to Pinal County line to D7. It adds shopping district within Yuma City limits to D7. It also evens out lines in the Casa Grande area for more straight lines. D6, D7 and D2 area almost perfect. |
CD0075 | BETTER CD Map Version off - 12.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map draws straighter lines for D6 around Casa Grande. Pulls the D6/D7 boundary in Tucson to Pantano Rd (instead of going through a neighborhood) and picks up the Tucson Mnt range population outside the areas of Marana and up to the Pinal county line...and includes the shopping district in the city of Yuma to D7 for a straighter line. This also leave D6 as almost a 50/50 district. |
Please have Lerner and Mehl look at this plan. It creates a 50/50 D6 by moving D6/D7 boundary to Pantano Rd in the panhandle area. It picks up the Tucson Mnt population up to Pinal County line to D7. It adds shopping district within Yuma City limits to D7. It also evens out lines in the Casa Grande area for more straight lines. D6, D7 and D2 area almost perfect. |
CD0076 | So Arizona CD Compromise off version 12.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Extends D7 along the border and gives part of Santa Cruz to D6, aredjusts Casa Grande and AZ City between D2 & D7. Slightly alters Wickenburg for D2 balance population |
Based off CD 12.1, this plan gives the state a 5/4 split. |
CD0076 | So Arizona CD Compromise off version 12.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | Extends D7 along the border and gives part of Santa Cruz to D6, aredjusts Casa Grande and AZ City between D2 & D7. Slightly alters Wickenburg for D2 balance population |
Based off CD 12.1, this plan gives the state a 5/4 split. |
CD0077 | Fair and Competitive Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map has multiple competitive districts that support the People of Arizona. This map is also relatively compact and mostly county compliant. |
The objective of this plan was to create competitive seats that support competitive elections. Based on a composite of recent Arizonian elections, this map would lead to 2 Safe Republican Seats (The 9th and the 5th), 2 Safe Democratic Seats (The 7th and the 3rd), 1 Democratic Leaning seat (The 2nd), 1 Republican Leaning seat (The 8th), And 3 pure tossup seats that both parties have a relatively |
CD0077 | Fair and Competitive Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional | This map has multiple competitive districts that support the People of Arizona. This map is also relatively compact and mostly county compliant. |
The objective of this plan was to create competitive seats that support competitive elections. Based on a composite of recent Arizonian elections, this map would lead to 2 Safe Republican Seats (The 9th and the 5th), 2 Safe Democratic Seats (The 7th and the 3rd), 1 Democratic Leaning seat (The 2nd), 1 Republican Leaning seat (The 8th), And 3 pure tossup seats that both parties have a relatively |
CDF001 | Competitive Congressional District - Southern Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Congressional district which keeps Cochise County whole, and joined with similar communities in Southern Pinal County and Eastern Pima County. Keeps Fort Huachuca in the same district as Davis Monthan. Protects the Cochise County community of interest. Politically competitive to ensure that Southern Arizona continue to receive attention and representation. |
Congressional district which keeps Cochise County whole, and joined with similar communities in Southern Pinal County and Eastern Pima County. Keeps Fort Huachuca in the same district as Davis-Monthan. Protects the Cochise County community of interest. Politically competitive to ensure that Southern Arizona issues continue to receive attention and representation. |
CDF001 | Competitive Congressional District - Southern Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Congressional district which keeps Cochise County whole, and joined with similar communities in Southern Pinal County and Eastern Pima County. Keeps Fort Huachuca in the same district as Davis Monthan. Protects the Cochise County community of interest. Politically competitive to ensure that Southern Arizona continue to receive attention and representation. |
Congressional district which keeps Cochise County whole, and joined with similar communities in Southern Pinal County and Eastern Pima County. Keeps Fort Huachuca in the same district as Davis-Monthan. Protects the Cochise County community of interest. Politically competitive to ensure that Southern Arizona issues continue to receive attention and representation. |
CDF002 | test3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | N/A |
This district has common values and communities of interest concerning water issues and land use, |
CDF002 | test3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | N/A |
This district has common values and communities of interest concerning water issues and land use, |
CDF003 | Balanced CD Map - CD2 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Single district map of CD2, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced CD Map - Full State'. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 in this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of |
Single district map of CD2, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced CD Map - Full State'. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 in this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of |
CDF003 | Balanced CD Map - CD2 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Single district map of CD2, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced CD Map - Full State'. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 in this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of |
Single district map of CD2, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced CD Map - Full State'. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 in this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of |
CDF004 | Competitive and Compact CD2 (Rural-Northern Arizona District) Not affiliated with any organization |
Congressional Focused | The following map is competitive and compact CD2. This version of CD2 includes 14 different Indian reservations, the Flagstaff-Verde Valley COI, the copper corridor COI, and agricultural parts of Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima counties. The district is extremely competitive, voting for both Democratic and Republican candidates in the last two cycles. This competition will elevate the voices of Native |
This proposal is of a fair, compact, and competitive CD2. It includes 14 different Indian Reservations, the Flagstaff-Verde Valley COI, the Copper Corridor COI, and agricultural regions of Pinal, Maricopa, and Pima counties. This district is extremely competitive having voted for both Democratic and Republican candidates the last two cycles. This competition will elevate the voices of Native |
CDF004 | Competitive and Compact CD2 (Rural-Northern Arizona District) Not affiliated with any organization |
Congressional Focused | The following map is competitive and compact CD2. This version of CD2 includes 14 different Indian reservations, the Flagstaff-Verde Valley COI, the copper corridor COI, and agricultural parts of Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima counties. The district is extremely competitive, voting for both Democratic and Republican candidates in the last two cycles. This competition will elevate the voices of Native |
This proposal is of a fair, compact, and competitive CD2. It includes 14 different Indian Reservations, the Flagstaff-Verde Valley COI, the Copper Corridor COI, and agricultural regions of Pinal, Maricopa, and Pima counties. This district is extremely competitive having voted for both Democratic and Republican candidates the last two cycles. This competition will elevate the voices of Native |
CDF005 | Darcie Plan 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | As a Peoria resident, I am extremely concerned with the IRC's most recent proposed map that splits Peoria in half. Peoria should remain whole. My proposed map starts with a whole Peoria and expands to encompass other like-minded communities in the West Valley. My children attend Peoria Unified School District, our school district should remain in one congressional district. Our school district is |
I am a resident of Peoria and Peoria should remain whole. This map starts with a whole Peoria and then expands to encompass other like-minded communities in the West Valley. |
CDF005 | Darcie Plan 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | As a Peoria resident, I am extremely concerned with the IRC's most recent proposed map that splits Peoria in half. Peoria should remain whole. My proposed map starts with a whole Peoria and expands to encompass other like-minded communities in the West Valley. My children attend Peoria Unified School District, our school district should remain in one congressional district. Our school district is |
I am a resident of Peoria and Peoria should remain whole. This map starts with a whole Peoria and then expands to encompass other like-minded communities in the West Valley. |
CDF006 | Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting Congressional Map South Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional Focused | This congressional plan includes a southern VRA complaint majority Latino district. The majority of the population in Pima County. |
This congressional map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains two VRA-compliant congressional districts that achieve Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Population of an estimated 52.28% for the Southern Arizona district and 50.26% for the Phoenix-based district. Without the possibility of a third majority Latino district, the coalition believes that these two |
CDF006 | Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting Congressional Map South Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional Focused | This congressional plan includes a southern VRA complaint majority Latino district. The majority of the population in Pima County. |
This congressional map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains two VRA-compliant congressional districts that achieve Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Population of an estimated 52.28% for the Southern Arizona district and 50.26% for the Phoenix-based district. Without the possibility of a third majority Latino district, the coalition believes that these two |
CDF007 | Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting Congressional Map Phoenix Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional Focused | Submitted on behalf of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. This congressional plan includes a VRA complaint majority Latino district with the majority of the population in Phoenix. |
This congressional map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains two VRA-compliant congressional districts that achieve Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Population of an estimated 52.28% for the Southern Arizona district and 50.26% for the Phoenix-based district. Without the possibility of a third majority Latino district, the coalition believes that these two |
CDF007 | Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting Congressional Map Phoenix Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Congressional Focused | Submitted on behalf of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. This congressional plan includes a VRA complaint majority Latino district with the majority of the population in Phoenix. |
This congressional map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains two VRA-compliant congressional districts that achieve Hispanic Citizen Voting Age Population of an estimated 52.28% for the Southern Arizona district and 50.26% for the Phoenix-based district. Without the possibility of a third majority Latino district, the coalition believes that these two |
CDF008 | CD2 - Native American - Copper Corridor - I10 Industrial Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Competitive CD2 which puts together Native American Communities, the Copper Corridor COI, and the I10 Industrial Corridor COI together. Because the raw materials which supply the I10 Industrial Corridor come from the copper corridor, this district seeks to cover an economic community of interest. |
-Create a district that unites the copper corridor and I10 Industrial corridor communities of interest. Because raw materials from the Verde Valley and Copper Corridor feed the industries along I10 Industrial Corridor, this district covers a unified economic community of interest. |
CDF008 | CD2 - Native American - Copper Corridor - I10 Industrial Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Competitive CD2 which puts together Native American Communities, the Copper Corridor COI, and the I10 Industrial Corridor COI together. Because the raw materials which supply the I10 Industrial Corridor come from the copper corridor, this district seeks to cover an economic community of interest. |
-Create a district that unites the copper corridor and I10 Industrial corridor communities of interest. Because raw materials from the Verde Valley and Copper Corridor feed the industries along I10 Industrial Corridor, this district covers a unified economic community of interest. |
CDF009 | Scottsdale and SRPMIC 5 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | A Community of Interest isn’t whether I shop at Frys or Bashas. It isn’t about my HOA. This is about how we elect those who will represent us in government. The one element I hear no one talking about is economic. In less than 20 years, the economy of Scottsdale and the people of the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community have become inextricably mingled. The car dealerships moved away from |
|
CDF009 | Scottsdale and SRPMIC 5 Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | A Community of Interest isn’t whether I shop at Frys or Bashas. It isn’t about my HOA. This is about how we elect those who will represent us in government. The one element I hear no one talking about is economic. In less than 20 years, the economy of Scottsdale and the people of the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community have become inextricably mingled. The car dealerships moved away from |
|
CDF010 | NNHRC congressional map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. This plan was submitted with 9 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
CDF010 | NNHRC congressional map Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. This plan was submitted with 9 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
CDF011 | Cave Creek Rd-Tatum Blvd Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Cave Creek, Carefree, Desert Ridge, North Phoenix |
This is a community of interest centered on the transportation, health, retail and entertainment corridor of Cave Creek Rd and Tatum Blvd. |
CDF011 | Cave Creek Rd-Tatum Blvd Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Cave Creek, Carefree, Desert Ridge, North Phoenix |
This is a community of interest centered on the transportation, health, retail and entertainment corridor of Cave Creek Rd and Tatum Blvd. |
CDF012 | North Phoenix I-17 Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Anthem, Norterra, Moon Valley, Sunnyslope |
A Community of Interest bound by proximity to and dependence on I-17 in North Phoenix. Comprised of Anthem, Tramonto, Norterra, Deer Valley, Moon Valley and Sunnyslope. |
CDF012 | North Phoenix I-17 Corridor Not affiliated with an organization |
Congressional Focused | Anthem, Norterra, Moon Valley, Sunnyslope |
A Community of Interest bound by proximity to and dependence on I-17 in North Phoenix. Comprised of Anthem, Tramonto, Norterra, Deer Valley, Moon Valley and Sunnyslope. |
LD0001 | Modified LD 16 & 17 map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | The legislative district boundary between district's 16 and 17 have been redrawn to ensure communities of interest are located within the district. |
N/A |
LD0001 | Modified LD 16 & 17 map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | The legislative district boundary between district's 16 and 17 have been redrawn to ensure communities of interest are located within the district. |
N/A |
LD0002 | 20-Sep Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0002 | 20-Sep Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0003 | AZ Legislative - Yuma-Window Rock Requests Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | My best attempt to address the requests I heard in the Yuma Window Rock review, at least in the corners. I don't think 2 legislative districts make sense in Yuma as the population just isn't high enough to support it without pushing the districts way out. |
N/A |
LD0003 | AZ Legislative - Yuma-Window Rock Requests Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | My best attempt to address the requests I heard in the Yuma Window Rock review, at least in the corners. I don't think 2 legislative districts make sense in Yuma as the population just isn't high enough to support it without pushing the districts way out. |
N/A |
LD0004 | Legislative Map Complete Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Passed integrity. |
This legislative district map was completed based upon natural and manmade boundaries, population balance, communities of interest, compactness and contiguousness as per the Arizona Constitution. |
LD0004 | Legislative Map Complete Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Passed integrity. |
This legislative district map was completed based upon natural and manmade boundaries, population balance, communities of interest, compactness and contiguousness as per the Arizona Constitution. |
LD0005 | stan map GOOD Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Compactness, concise, numerical balance, competitive, natural boundaries, and man made boundaries, as well as communities of interest. |
LD0005 | stan map GOOD Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Compactness, concise, numerical balance, competitive, natural boundaries, and man made boundaries, as well as communities of interest. |
LD0006 | Tellman LD plan Independent - Southern Arizona |
Legislative | N/A |
To meet all the required criteria and develop a plan that was more functional than the current plan for southern Arizona political parties, as well as some rural LDs in other parts of the state. |
LD0006 | Tellman LD plan Independent - Southern Arizona |
Legislative | N/A |
To meet all the required criteria and develop a plan that was more functional than the current plan for southern Arizona political parties, as well as some rural LDs in other parts of the state. |
LD0007 | Tellman LD Plan version 2 Independent - Southern Arizona |
Legislative | N/A |
To meet all the required criteria and fix some problems arising from the previous plan |
LD0007 | Tellman LD Plan version 2 Independent - Southern Arizona |
Legislative | N/A |
To meet all the required criteria and fix some problems arising from the previous plan |
LD0008 | Pima County Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Boundaries contiguous, communities of interest, and population |
These boundaries highlight the natural geo physical,(rivers and mountain ranges) contiguous areas, as well as communities of interest in Northern Pima County, Arizona |
LD0008 | Pima County Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Boundaries contiguous, communities of interest, and population |
These boundaries highlight the natural geo physical,(rivers and mountain ranges) contiguous areas, as well as communities of interest in Northern Pima County, Arizona |
LD0009 | lobrien GOP PC |
Legislative | N/A |
I modified the districts to allow for district 17 to reflect a better representation of it's boundaries that reflect the communities that are diverse but have common reasons for living the northwest portion of Pima County. |
LD0009 | lobrien GOP PC |
Legislative | N/A |
I modified the districts to allow for district 17 to reflect a better representation of it's boundaries that reflect the communities that are diverse but have common reasons for living the northwest portion of Pima County. |
LD0010 | AZ LD - 2 out of 3 - V1a Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0010 | AZ LD - 2 out of 3 - V1a Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0011 | Legislative Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map addresses issues in Southern Arizona as well the rural areas. An effort was made to maintain the status quo adjusting for population growth. The districts in Maricopa County were drawn for equal population distribution and may or may not be relevant. |
LD0011 | Legislative Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map addresses issues in Southern Arizona as well the rural areas. An effort was made to maintain the status quo adjusting for population growth. The districts in Maricopa County were drawn for equal population distribution and may or may not be relevant. |
LD0012 | 0006 Rebised Independent |
Legislative | N/A |
This is a minor revision of DL0006. The San Xavier District was inadvertently left out of D20 It is now corrected. Please use instead of DL0006 |
LD0012 | 0006 Rebised Independent |
Legislative | N/A |
This is a minor revision of DL0006. The San Xavier District was inadvertently left out of D20 It is now corrected. Please use instead of DL0006 |
LD0013 | Coconino - Legislative District Draft Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map’s focus is on Legislative Districts (“LD”) 6 and 7. For the sake of being able to submit the map via the mapping tool, all the districts have been balanced within the +/- 5% deviation. The map follows the guidelines of Prop 106 and protects several communities of interest, such as: Rural communities; • The Verde Valley to protect the watershed and forest fire prevention communities of |
Perhaps more importantly, this map protects Native Americans and other minority groups under the Voting Rights Act. One such example is that this map raises the Native American population in LD 7 from 31.58% to over 50%, allowing LD 7 to be a minority-majority district. |
LD0013 | Coconino - Legislative District Draft Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map’s focus is on Legislative Districts (“LD”) 6 and 7. For the sake of being able to submit the map via the mapping tool, all the districts have been balanced within the +/- 5% deviation. The map follows the guidelines of Prop 106 and protects several communities of interest, such as: Rural communities; • The Verde Valley to protect the watershed and forest fire prevention communities of |
Perhaps more importantly, this map protects Native Americans and other minority groups under the Voting Rights Act. One such example is that this map raises the Native American population in LD 7 from 31.58% to over 50%, allowing LD 7 to be a minority-majority district. |
LD0014 | OldendorphLD17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Oldendorph map plan |
These meet your requirements of population, compactness, contiguous, communities of interess and follows the Arizona State Constitution requirments for redistricting. |
LD0014 | OldendorphLD17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Oldendorph map plan |
These meet your requirements of population, compactness, contiguous, communities of interess and follows the Arizona State Constitution requirments for redistricting. |
LD0015 | LDstatewidefinished102 myself |
Legislative | passed tests |
Focus is on North, North Central and Northeast AZ LD districts to keep the Verde Valley COI in with LD6 making for a Competitive District and a Competitive State. |
LD0015 | LDstatewidefinished102 myself |
Legislative | passed tests |
Focus is on North, North Central and Northeast AZ LD districts to keep the Verde Valley COI in with LD6 making for a Competitive District and a Competitive State. |
LD0016 | Competetive LD map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A competitive LD map which respects many communities of interest. |
This is a competetive LD map which respects many communities of interest |
LD0016 | Competetive LD map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A competitive LD map which respects many communities of interest. |
This is a competetive LD map which respects many communities of interest |
LD0017 | Mountain Preserve COI rev2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map creates an approximate 2 mile radius around the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve as a community of interest for recreation and popular centers of worship that border the mountains. Attempts to rebalance the adjoining districts are made. |
This plan creates a Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. Rather than the preserves being the dividing line between districts, this plan recognizes the community within a close radius with whom the preserves are central to their lifestyle. The preserves are a center of recreation and family activity. Additionally, several churches, synagogues, and faith based centers border the |
LD0017 | Mountain Preserve COI rev2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map creates an approximate 2 mile radius around the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve as a community of interest for recreation and popular centers of worship that border the mountains. Attempts to rebalance the adjoining districts are made. |
This plan creates a Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. Rather than the preserves being the dividing line between districts, this plan recognizes the community within a close radius with whom the preserves are central to their lifestyle. The preserves are a center of recreation and family activity. Additionally, several churches, synagogues, and faith based centers border the |
LD0018 | Highly Proportional Legislative Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A Legislative district map that adheres to the 6 constitutional criteria and has a Daves Redistricting App proportionality score of 93%. It incorporates inputs from communities of interest surveys and gives adequate representation to minority communities. |
1. Disconnects the North Valley cities from LD1 2. Maintains 3 US border districts 3. Creates a Colorado river district 4. Maintains a Native American majority district 5. Creates a North West Pinal County district 6. Creates an entirely suburban and competitive district around Tucson 7. Creates a district entirely within Gilbert 8. Creates a new West Valley District that is majority minority and |
LD0018 | Highly Proportional Legislative Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A Legislative district map that adheres to the 6 constitutional criteria and has a Daves Redistricting App proportionality score of 93%. It incorporates inputs from communities of interest surveys and gives adequate representation to minority communities. |
1. Disconnects the North Valley cities from LD1 2. Maintains 3 US border districts 3. Creates a Colorado river district 4. Maintains a Native American majority district 5. Creates a North West Pinal County district 6. Creates an entirely suburban and competitive district around Tucson 7. Creates a district entirely within Gilbert 8. Creates a new West Valley District that is majority minority and |
LD0019 | Legislative Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This Map is intended meet all the requirements of Proposition 106 with special emphasis on Communities of Interest and County lines, City and Town limits and Native American Community boundaries. No Native American Communities are split. The Northern Arizona urban area including Flagstaff and Prescott are in a single District. Phoenix is included in six Phoenix only Districts, Mesa in two Mesa |
LD0019 | Legislative Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This Map is intended meet all the requirements of Proposition 106 with special emphasis on Communities of Interest and County lines, City and Town limits and Native American Community boundaries. No Native American Communities are split. The Northern Arizona urban area including Flagstaff and Prescott are in a single District. Phoenix is included in six Phoenix only Districts, Mesa in two Mesa |
LD0020 | Legislative V2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This Map is intended meet all the requirements of Proposition 106 with special emphasis on Communities of Interest and County lines, City and Town limits and Native American Community boundaries. No Native American Communities are split. The Northern Arizona urban area including Flagstaff and Prescott are in a single District. Phoenix is included in six Phoenix only Districts, Mesa in two Mesa |
LD0020 | Legislative V2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This Map is intended meet all the requirements of Proposition 106 with special emphasis on Communities of Interest and County lines, City and Town limits and Native American Community boundaries. No Native American Communities are split. The Northern Arizona urban area including Flagstaff and Prescott are in a single District. Phoenix is included in six Phoenix only Districts, Mesa in two Mesa |
LD0021 | AZ Leg - WBeard Final Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | 30 Legislative districts with a focus on Southern Arizona representation. |
30 Legislative districts with a strong focus on Southern Arizona representation. |
LD0021 | AZ Leg - WBeard Final Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | 30 Legislative districts with a focus on Southern Arizona representation. |
30 Legislative districts with a strong focus on Southern Arizona representation. |
LD0022 | tellman LD0006 revised for better compactness Independent citizen |
Legislative | tellman 0006_rebised looks like a fair map in PlanScore but had some compactness issues I wanted to try to fix. I modified D3 & D4, along with D5, D29 & D30. Overall the changes didn't change the fairness of the map much in PlanScore but produced better compactness scores. This map leans slightly Republican. |
The tellman LD 0006 map appeared to be very balanced in PlanScore but had a few districts (D3 & D4, and D5, D29 & D30 as a group of 3) I thought could be improved for compactness. The changes I make did not hurt in PlanScore and did improve compactness so, to me, they seem like a small positive contribution to the cause. I hope someone is listening... |
LD0022 | tellman LD0006 revised for better compactness Independent citizen |
Legislative | tellman 0006_rebised looks like a fair map in PlanScore but had some compactness issues I wanted to try to fix. I modified D3 & D4, along with D5, D29 & D30. Overall the changes didn't change the fairness of the map much in PlanScore but produced better compactness scores. This map leans slightly Republican. |
The tellman LD 0006 map appeared to be very balanced in PlanScore but had a few districts (D3 & D4, and D5, D29 & D30 as a group of 3) I thought could be improved for compactness. The changes I make did not hurt in PlanScore and did improve compactness so, to me, they seem like a small positive contribution to the cause. I hope someone is listening... |
LD0023 | Balanced LD Map - Full State Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is a map of statewide legislative districts developed with a focus on LD6 and LD7. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have been made competitive where possible. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a +1% deviation in population for LD5 and a |
This is a map of statewide legislative districts developed with a focus on LD6 and LD7. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have been made competitive where possible. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a +1% deviation in population for LD5 and a |
LD0023 | Balanced LD Map - Full State Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is a map of statewide legislative districts developed with a focus on LD6 and LD7. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have been made competitive where possible. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a +1% deviation in population for LD5 and a |
This is a map of statewide legislative districts developed with a focus on LD6 and LD7. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have been made competitive where possible. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a +1% deviation in population for LD5 and a |
LD0024 | Revised LD19 concerned citizen |
Legislative | Santa Cruz County is a border county with strong ties to the UofA and Tucson. We form a strong COI with Green Valley and Sahuarita, whose residents attend our events and support our non-profits. |
1. Remove Sierra Vista from the district. They are not like us, but are so numerous they will dominate our entire county just with numbers. Everything else can be negotiated, but not that. 2. Add the communities of Sonoita and Elgin from NE Santa Cruz Counties to LD7. They testified as a group at the COI hearing. Many of us testified that we wanted SC County to stay whole, but better lose Sonoita |
LD0024 | Revised LD19 concerned citizen |
Legislative | Santa Cruz County is a border county with strong ties to the UofA and Tucson. We form a strong COI with Green Valley and Sahuarita, whose residents attend our events and support our non-profits. |
1. Remove Sierra Vista from the district. They are not like us, but are so numerous they will dominate our entire county just with numbers. Everything else can be negotiated, but not that. 2. Add the communities of Sonoita and Elgin from NE Santa Cruz Counties to LD7. They testified as a group at the COI hearing. Many of us testified that we wanted SC County to stay whole, but better lose Sonoita |
LD0025 | Yavapai-Apache Nation Legislative Map - LD6 Yavapai-Apache Nation |
Legislative | This is the map submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation, focused only on Legislative District 6. Please see the comments submitted by letter from Chairman Jon Huey. |
This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation to the IRC in the Grid Maps phase of the redistricting process. This map is exclusively focused on Legislative District 6, which would include the Yavapai-Apache Nation, as well as 9 other federally recognized tribes. This map would preserve an opportunity district for Native American voters in north and eastern Arizona. The other districts in |
LD0025 | Yavapai-Apache Nation Legislative Map - LD6 Yavapai-Apache Nation |
Legislative | This is the map submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation, focused only on Legislative District 6. Please see the comments submitted by letter from Chairman Jon Huey. |
This is the submission of the Yavapai-Apache Nation to the IRC in the Grid Maps phase of the redistricting process. This map is exclusively focused on Legislative District 6, which would include the Yavapai-Apache Nation, as well as 9 other federally recognized tribes. This map would preserve an opportunity district for Native American voters in north and eastern Arizona. The other districts in |
LD0026 | ArizonaLegislative Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Arizona Census 2020 Hispanic 30.7% Black 5% Native American 5% 9 districts (30%) with Hispanic majority populations (#1, #2, #4, #19, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26)and all 9 have overall minority populations over 60%.District #30 is 50% Native American. |
LD0026 | ArizonaLegislative Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Arizona Census 2020 Hispanic 30.7% Black 5% Native American 5% 9 districts (30%) with Hispanic majority populations (#1, #2, #4, #19, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26)and all 9 have overall minority populations over 60%.District #30 is 50% Native American. |
LD0027 | EqualAZ-Legislative Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Logical boundaries with close to a 0.00% |
This Legislative District Map creates boundaries that are logical, simple and pertain to that region. The population percentage is 0.00% for all districts and all but one have single digit variation. |
LD0027 | EqualAZ-Legislative Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Logical boundaries with close to a 0.00% |
This Legislative District Map creates boundaries that are logical, simple and pertain to that region. The population percentage is 0.00% for all districts and all but one have single digit variation. |
LD0028 | Maitland Map #3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Goal to keep 4 districts within Pima County with a 5th district comprising Pima, and all of Santa Cruz and Cochise counties. Overall results yield 7 Latino and 1 Native American minority/majority districts. Achieved 8 competitive districts, 9 safe democrat and 13 safe republican. |
LD0028 | Maitland Map #3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Goal to keep 4 districts within Pima County with a 5th district comprising Pima, and all of Santa Cruz and Cochise counties. Overall results yield 7 Latino and 1 Native American minority/majority districts. Achieved 8 competitive districts, 9 safe democrat and 13 safe republican. |
LD0029 | LD19 Extension 10-17021 Parrilli Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Extends western boundary of LD 19 into eastern Santa Cruz County, to include Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and San Raphael Valley to the southern border. |
Extends the west boundary of LD19 to the west to include Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley all the way to the border. It DOES NOT include the town of Patagonia. |
LD0029 | LD19 Extension 10-17021 Parrilli Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Extends western boundary of LD 19 into eastern Santa Cruz County, to include Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and San Raphael Valley to the southern border. |
Extends the west boundary of LD19 to the west to include Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley all the way to the border. It DOES NOT include the town of Patagonia. |
LD0030 | RJF 17Oct21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Aligns East Valley by cities and major thoroughfares. |
Align East Valley LDs around major thoroughfares. Maintain city/town as one LD where practical. |
LD0030 | RJF_17Oct21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Aligns East Valley by cities and major thoroughfares. |
Align East Valley LDs around major thoroughfares. Maintain city/town as one LD where practical. |
LD0031 | LD17 Oro Valley Casas Adobes Foothills Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A refinement of published LD0029. Just corrected some blemishes. |
A cleanup of LD0029 |
LD0031 | LD17 Oro Valley Casas Adobes Foothills Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | A refinement of published LD0029. Just corrected some blemishes. |
A cleanup of LD0029 |
LD0032 | Revised 4.1 Map - LD 12-13 adjustments Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Adjusted boundary between LD 12 and 13 at Dobson Road. |
Align Intel precincts in western Chandler with the Kyrene school district. Maintains Chandler precincts as population grows eastward. Adjusts district borders with geographically significant borders. |
LD0032 | Revised 4.1 Map - LD 12-13 adjustments Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Adjusted boundary between LD 12 and 13 at Dobson Road. |
Align Intel precincts in western Chandler with the Kyrene school district. Maintains Chandler precincts as population grows eastward. Adjusts district borders with geographically significant borders. |
LD0033 | SaguaroMaps002 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Tucson/Pima County LD Maps |
This map keeps the communities of interest in Pima and Pinal county together: Oro Valley, Marana and Saddlebrooke. |
LD0033 | SaguaroMaps002 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Tucson/Pima County LD Maps |
This map keeps the communities of interest in Pima and Pinal county together: Oro Valley, Marana and Saddlebrooke. |
LD0034 | LD Test Ver 6 0 with Phoenix Mtn Preserve COI Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is a modification to LD Test Map 6.0 that takes the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest into mind. All districts are population balanced. |
This plan modifies LD Test Map Ver 6.0 to include the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. The Commission had graciously considered this COI in ver 5.0 and 5.1 but it was removed when the LD maps were restored to ver 3.2 on Oct 20th. This map maintains the integrity of what the IRC wanted in 6.0 while also including the Mountain Preserve COI. |
LD0034 | LD_Test_Ver_6_0 with Phoenix Mtn Preserve COI Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is a modification to LD Test Map 6.0 that takes the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest into mind. All districts are population balanced. |
This plan modifies LD Test Map Ver 6.0 to include the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. The Commission had graciously considered this COI in ver 5.0 and 5.1 but it was removed when the LD maps were restored to ver 3.2 on Oct 20th. This map maintains the integrity of what the IRC wanted in 6.0 while also including the Mountain Preserve COI. |
LD0035 | Brian Bickel LD6.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
The objective of this plan was to equalize population, all less than +/-5% and include as mush of Marana with Oro Valley as possible. I realize that Marana is split among three districts but the piece in D16 is sparsely populated and D20 most people visiting to that area are not aware they are in Marana, many if not most think they are in Tucson. |
LD0035 | Brian Bickel LD6.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
The objective of this plan was to equalize population, all less than +/-5% and include as mush of Marana with Oro Valley as possible. I realize that Marana is split among three districts but the piece in D16 is sparsely populated and D20 most people visiting to that area are not aware they are in Marana, many if not most think they are in Tucson. |
LD0036 | ScbLdmapplan1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Map shows consolidation of tribal entities since they share community of interests and share opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. |
Keep tribal communities of interest and compactness in tact. Allow Navajo and Native voters to elect candidates of their choice in district elections. |
LD0036 | ScbLdmapplan1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Map shows consolidation of tribal entities since they share community of interests and share opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. |
Keep tribal communities of interest and compactness in tact. Allow Navajo and Native voters to elect candidates of their choice in district elections. |
LD0037 | Equal AZ - LD Test Map 8.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map better defines southern AZ regionally and logically. |
This map fixes Southern AZ. Tanque Verde SHOULD NOT be associated with Marana and Oro Valley. This map includes Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth in D17. But it expands D18 to include Tanque Verde Region and keeps Summerhaven in D18 (since the only way to access it is through D18). It also adjusts D19 to better represent SE Arizona and ranch land. D19 SHOULD NOT go north of Cochise County line. |
LD0037 | Equal AZ - LD Test Map 8.1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map better defines southern AZ regionally and logically. |
This map fixes Southern AZ. Tanque Verde SHOULD NOT be associated with Marana and Oro Valley. This map includes Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth in D17. But it expands D18 to include Tanque Verde Region and keeps Summerhaven in D18 (since the only way to access it is through D18). It also adjusts D19 to better represent SE Arizona and ranch land. D19 SHOULD NOT go north of Cochise County line. |
LD0038 | Southern AZ Correction to LD 8.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Corrects problems with 8.0 map. Includes S Tucson within LD 21. Balances populations in remaining S Az districts. Maintains communities of interest. |
Corrects communities of interest issues with LD 8.0 version. |
LD0038 | Southern AZ Correction to LD 8.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Corrects problems with 8.0 map. Includes S Tucson within LD 21. Balances populations in remaining S Az districts. Maintains communities of interest. |
Corrects communities of interest issues with LD 8.0 version. |
LD0039 | Constitutionally Balanced correct map for So. Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map connects all communities of interests and populations while adhering to compactness and contiguousness as required by the AZ Constitution. Other maps jump mountain ranges, cut out neighborhoods and streets to achieve a highly gerrymandered "answer" to this difficult exercise. I hope that the commission will redress these issues with new mapping options this week. |
This plan was deigned to maintain compactness and communities of interest. In doing so we also maintained population and contiguousness of the areas. No attempt to jump mountains or cut out neighborhoods was needed to achieve balance and Constitutionality. This map is a simple and acceptable alternative to LD Test Map 8.0 |
LD0039 | Constitutionally Balanced correct map for So. Arizona Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map connects all communities of interests and populations while adhering to compactness and contiguousness as required by the AZ Constitution. Other maps jump mountain ranges, cut out neighborhoods and streets to achieve a highly gerrymandered "answer" to this difficult exercise. I hope that the commission will redress these issues with new mapping options this week. |
This plan was deigned to maintain compactness and communities of interest. In doing so we also maintained population and contiguousness of the areas. No attempt to jump mountains or cut out neighborhoods was needed to achieve balance and Constitutionality. This map is a simple and acceptable alternative to LD Test Map 8.0 |
LD0040 | Maintain LD17 competitiveness diminished in version 8.0 Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Maintain Navaho district while adjusting LD17 compactness and competitiveness to earlier versions of the map. |
Reinstate competitiveness for Tucson area districts diminished in version 8.0; incorporating Navaho nation map suggestions while still maintaining deviation requirements. |
LD0040 | Maintain LD17 competitiveness diminished in version 8.0 Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Maintain Navaho district while adjusting LD17 compactness and competitiveness to earlier versions of the map. |
Reinstate competitiveness for Tucson area districts diminished in version 8.0; incorporating Navaho nation map suggestions while still maintaining deviation requirements. |
LD0041 | LD Ver 8 0 with Mtn Preserve COI Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map modifies LD Test Map 8.0 to accommodate the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve community of interest. The preserve runs along North Mountain, Piestewa Peak, and Camelback Mountain and the community is the ring around the perimeter. All districts are balanced and LD1 is more competitive than in 8.0. |
This plan is a modification of the LD ver 8.0 test map. It moves D1 North and East in order to accommodate a Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. The COI encircles the preserve from North Mountain - Piestewa Peak - Camelback Mountain. It also includes Paradise Valley which helps the competitiveness of both LD1 and LD4. |
LD0041 | LD_Ver_8_0_with_Mtn_Preserve_COI Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map modifies LD Test Map 8.0 to accommodate the Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve community of interest. The preserve runs along North Mountain, Piestewa Peak, and Camelback Mountain and the community is the ring around the perimeter. All districts are balanced and LD1 is more competitive than in 8.0. |
This plan is a modification of the LD ver 8.0 test map. It moves D1 North and East in order to accommodate a Central Phoenix Mountain Preserve Community of Interest. The COI encircles the preserve from North Mountain - Piestewa Peak - Camelback Mountain. It also includes Paradise Valley which helps the competitiveness of both LD1 and LD4. |
LD0042 | Perfect for Southern AZ LDs none. |
Legislative | This map represents the best LDs for Southern AZ. They meet Communities of Interest, and the compact and congruity test as well as many more. Please take a look and seriously consider. Thank you! |
D17 uses the Rillito River as its southern border. It is a competitive district. It is compact and contiguous. |
LD0042 | Perfect for Southern AZ LDs none. |
Legislative | This map represents the best LDs for Southern AZ. They meet Communities of Interest, and the compact and congruity test as well as many more. Please take a look and seriously consider. Thank you! |
D17 uses the Rillito River as its southern border. It is a competitive district. It is compact and contiguous. |
LD0043 | Equal AZ - LD Map 8.2 UPDATE!! Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan accommodates Mehls desire to include Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth and keeps Oro Valley and Marana together. D18 now includes Tanque Verde and the Rincon Mtns and Saguaro Ntl Mnmt East. It also take Davis Monthan out of D19 which Lerner preferred. |
This plan fixes mainly southern AZ. Allows for Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth into D17 with Oro Valley, Marana and Saddlebrook. Tanque Verde region moves into Catalina Foothills/Mtns and Saguaro Ntl Mnmt in D18. Adds Davis Monthan AFB to D21 and downtown in D20 with westside. Keeps integrity of SE AZ in D19. Allows for the growth of the Casa Grande Sector in D16 to include AZ City, Maricopa and |
LD0043 | Equal AZ - LD Map 8.2 UPDATE!! Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan accommodates Mehls desire to include Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth and keeps Oro Valley and Marana together. D18 now includes Tanque Verde and the Rincon Mtns and Saguaro Ntl Mnmt East. It also take Davis Monthan out of D19 which Lerner preferred. |
This plan fixes mainly southern AZ. Allows for Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth into D17 with Oro Valley, Marana and Saddlebrook. Tanque Verde region moves into Catalina Foothills/Mtns and Saguaro Ntl Mnmt in D18. Adds Davis Monthan AFB to D21 and downtown in D20 with westside. Keeps integrity of SE AZ in D19. Allows for the growth of the Casa Grande Sector in D16 to include AZ City, Maricopa and |
LD0044 | Tucson Area Border Clean-Up from 9.2 Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Adjust borders to improve continuity among neighborhoods. |
Balance population along borders compared to map version 9.2 |
LD0044 | Tucson Area Border Clean-Up from 9.2 Chandler Resident |
Legislative | Adjust borders to improve continuity among neighborhoods. |
Balance population along borders compared to map version 9.2 |
LD0045 | City vs County Pima Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0045 | City vs County Pima Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
N/A |
LD0046 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Final Draft Adjusted Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is the final draft map adjusted to reflect the 5+ Eastern Counties District, solely rural and undivided. Adjustments made to the Tucson and Phoenix metro areas are arbitrary and not disputed by us. District 7, as represented here, protects the voting power of the Rural Minority located in Eastern Arizona. |
This is the final draft map adjusted to reflect the 5+ Eastern Counties District, solely rural and undivided. Adjustments made to the Tucson and Phoenix Metro Areas are arbitrary and not disputed by us. District 7, as represented here, protects the voting power of the Rural Minority located in Eastern Arizona. |
LD0046 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Final Draft Adjusted Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This is the final draft map adjusted to reflect the 5+ Eastern Counties District, solely rural and undivided. Adjustments made to the Tucson and Phoenix metro areas are arbitrary and not disputed by us. District 7, as represented here, protects the voting power of the Rural Minority located in Eastern Arizona. |
This is the final draft map adjusted to reflect the 5+ Eastern Counties District, solely rural and undivided. Adjustments made to the Tucson and Phoenix Metro Areas are arbitrary and not disputed by us. District 7, as represented here, protects the voting power of the Rural Minority located in Eastern Arizona. |
LD0047 | East Valley Competitiveness Map v1 Chandler resident |
Legislative | - Eliminates D12 stretching across northern Chandler to Gilbert |
1. Ensure competitiveness and compactness across the three districts in the east valley |
LD0047 | East Valley Competitiveness Map_v1 Chandler resident |
Legislative | - Eliminates D12 stretching across northern Chandler to Gilbert |
1. Ensure competitiveness and compactness across the three districts in the east valley |
LD0048 | LD 10.0 TUCSON ESTATES AVRA VALLEY FIX Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Fixes problem with Tucson Estates area too divided. |
LD 10.0 separates the Tucson Estates Avra Valley Community of Interest into three LDs. This fix puts that Community of Interest in LD 20 with the Tucson Metropolitan area where it belongs. |
LD0048 | LD 10.0 TUCSON ESTATES AVRA VALLEY FIX Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Fixes problem with Tucson Estates area too divided. |
LD 10.0 separates the Tucson Estates Avra Valley Community of Interest into three LDs. This fix puts that Community of Interest in LD 20 with the Tucson Metropolitan area where it belongs. |
LD0049 | ld 10.0 Fix Tucson Estates and Tucson Mountains Communities of Interest Self |
Legislative | This version respects two separate communities of interest while satisfying all criteria. I also increases compactness. |
Objectives were to preserve the Tucson Estates/ Avra Valley Communities of Interest and also preserve the Tucson Mountains Community of Interest. LD10.0 badly divided the East side of the Tucson Mountains Community from the Tucson Metro Area, placing locations just a few miles from downtown in D16 which includes much of Pinal County. This version replaces Starr Pass Resort and precincts from Grant |
LD0049 | ld 10.0 Fix Tucson Estates and Tucson Mountains Communities of Interest Self |
Legislative | This version respects two separate communities of interest while satisfying all criteria. I also increases compactness. |
Objectives were to preserve the Tucson Estates/ Avra Valley Communities of Interest and also preserve the Tucson Mountains Community of Interest. LD10.0 badly divided the East side of the Tucson Mountains Community from the Tucson Metro Area, placing locations just a few miles from downtown in D16 which includes much of Pinal County. This version replaces Starr Pass Resort and precincts from Grant |
LD0050 | LD 10.4 None |
Legislative | This map makes Cortaro Road a straighter natural boundary and it more evenly distributes the population between 17 and 18. |
This plan more evenly distributed LD 17 and 18 population. It makes a straighter line of Cortaro Farms Rd as a natural boundary. |
LD0050 | LD 10.4 None |
Legislative | This map makes Cortaro Road a straighter natural boundary and it more evenly distributes the population between 17 and 18. |
This plan more evenly distributed LD 17 and 18 population. It makes a straighter line of Cortaro Farms Rd as a natural boundary. |
LD0051 | Final Legislative Map Based on Approved Draft Map - Balance S AZ Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Add newly designated Pasqua Yaqui community near Grant/Oracle to the same LD on SW side of Tucson. Balance populations in Pima County. |
Plan adds the newly designated Pasqua Yaqui community into the same LD as the existing community on the SW side of Tucson. Balances population in remaining Pima County districts to compensate for the adjustments. |
LD0051 | Final Legislative Map Based on Approved Draft Map - Balance S AZ Districts Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Add newly designated Pasqua Yaqui community near Grant/Oracle to the same LD on SW side of Tucson. Balance populations in Pima County. |
Plan adds the newly designated Pasqua Yaqui community into the same LD as the existing community on the SW side of Tucson. Balances population in remaining Pima County districts to compensate for the adjustments. |
LD0052 | LD0049 with refinements to LD 8 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map completes the task of unifying LD 20 and lessen gerrymandering and increasing compactness of LD 16 |
This plan, based on LD0049. makes further reductions in the gerrymandering of LD 16 and increases the compactness of LD 20 |
LD0052 | LD0049 with refinements to LD 8 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map completes the task of unifying LD 20 and lessen gerrymandering and increasing compactness of LD 16 |
This plan, based on LD0049. makes further reductions in the gerrymandering of LD 16 and increases the compactness of LD 20 |
LD0053 | NEW - Legislative Combination of 10.0 & 9.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This Legislative Map's goal is to redistribute southern AZ and the Tucson region for more contiguous borders and more competitive districts where possible. D17 is now almost 50/50 and Santa Cruz County and River Valley have been redrawn to rely less on Tucson population with more similar regions. |
This legislative district map changes a few of the traditional shapes we're used to seeing and offers a combination of approved plan 10.0 and what seems to be the more favored 9.0 plan in these meetings. D17 is now competitive and contiguous. Santa Cruz County is now one and part of a larger Santa Cruz River valley district. UA is part of D20 as Mayor Romero requested. D23 consists of native |
LD0053 | NEW - Legislative Combination of 10.0 & 9.0 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This Legislative Map's goal is to redistribute southern AZ and the Tucson region for more contiguous borders and more competitive districts where possible. D17 is now almost 50/50 and Santa Cruz County and River Valley have been redrawn to rely less on Tucson population with more similar regions. |
This legislative district map changes a few of the traditional shapes we're used to seeing and offers a combination of approved plan 10.0 and what seems to be the more favored 9.0 plan in these meetings. D17 is now competitive and contiguous. Santa Cruz County is now one and part of a larger Santa Cruz River valley district. UA is part of D20 as Mayor Romero requested. D23 consists of native |
LD0054 | UPDATED - Legislative Map based on 10.0 & 9.0 with clear Native Representati more Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This updated Legislative map fully includes some native reservations that were previously divided into separate districts. It also realigns D19 to be more contiguous. Makes D17 more competitive and proper. This map vastly improves southern AZ. |
This Legislative District Map is an upgraded version from the previous edition. The former had native reservation overlap. This version has every native reservation fully in its own district. It keeps the Navajo Nation and smaller tribes together in D6. Gila in D16 and Tohono O'odam fully in D23 including its San Xavier Mission. Yavapai Nation-Salt River near Phoenix is part of D7 for full |
LD0054 | UPDATED - Legislative Map based on 10.0 & 9.0 with clear Native Representati more Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This updated Legislative map fully includes some native reservations that were previously divided into separate districts. It also realigns D19 to be more contiguous. Makes D17 more competitive and proper. This map vastly improves southern AZ. |
This Legislative District Map is an upgraded version from the previous edition. The former had native reservation overlap. This version has every native reservation fully in its own district. It keeps the Navajo Nation and smaller tribes together in D6. Gila in D16 and Tohono O'odam fully in D23 including its San Xavier Mission. Yavapai Nation-Salt River near Phoenix is part of D7 for full |
LD0055 | LD 0052 with Tohono O'Odham Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map further revised LD 0052 to add Tohono O'Odham to LD 21 |
This plan makes further modifications to LD0052 by including the Tohono O'Odham with Pima County Districts where their historical and commercial interests are located, not with distant Yuma. Both the Nation and San Xavier areas are included along with their casinos. This map increases compactness |
LD0055 | LD 0052 with Tohono O'Odham Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map further revised LD 0052 to add Tohono O'Odham to LD 21 |
This plan makes further modifications to LD0052 by including the Tohono O'Odham with Pima County Districts where their historical and commercial interests are located, not with distant Yuma. Both the Nation and San Xavier areas are included along with their casinos. This map increases compactness |
LD0056 | LD Pima County Competitive Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map of Legislative Districts in Pima County maintains the requirements of the Constitution with a balance for competitiveness while maintaining population, compactness and communities of interest as well as providing for some legislative balance. |
The focus of this map is Pima County. It is consistent with the direction given to the IRC, it is somewhat competitive but more importantly, respects the many community of interest testimonies by those who live in northern Pima County. The urban City of Tucson is separate and distinct from rural parts of the county. It also provides for a "Community of Interest" of a more balanced Arizona |
LD0056 | LD Pima County Competitive Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map of Legislative Districts in Pima County maintains the requirements of the Constitution with a balance for competitiveness while maintaining population, compactness and communities of interest as well as providing for some legislative balance. |
The focus of this map is Pima County. It is consistent with the direction given to the IRC, it is somewhat competitive but more importantly, respects the many community of interest testimonies by those who live in northern Pima County. The urban City of Tucson is separate and distinct from rural parts of the county. It also provides for a "Community of Interest" of a more balanced Arizona |
LD0057 | Yuma Gold LDs Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Preferred community-based Yuma LD map |
Adjustments to version 10 with updated Yuma and Maricopa Communities of Interest |
LD0057 | Yuma Gold LDs Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Preferred community-based Yuma LD map |
Adjustments to version 10 with updated Yuma and Maricopa Communities of Interest |
LD0058 | Consolidated Gilbert Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan consolidates the Town of Gilbert so it is split across fewer legislative districts. |
This plan splits Gilbert into only two legislative districts instead of five. |
LD0058 | Consolidated Gilbert Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan consolidates the Town of Gilbert so it is split across fewer legislative districts. |
This plan splits Gilbert into only two legislative districts instead of five. |
LD0059 | Equitable Legislative Map for Southern AZ Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This LD map focuses on compromise in Southern AZ. It creates regional communities of interest in contiguous districts based on feedback from the public meetings. |
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS MAP. This LD map is about compromise in Southern AZ. |
LD0059 | Equitable Legislative Map for Southern AZ Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This LD map focuses on compromise in Southern AZ. It creates regional communities of interest in contiguous districts based on feedback from the public meetings. |
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS MAP. This LD map is about compromise in Southern AZ. |
LD0060 | AFY - LD Proposal 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Legislative District proposal concentrating on Gilbert and Queen Creek. |
To reflect communities of interest and town boundaries in the East Valley, concentrating on Gilbert and Queen Creek. I also moved LD15 to west of Gilbert to cover half of Chandler. Changes were made throughout. |
LD0060 | AFY - LD Proposal 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Legislative District proposal concentrating on Gilbert and Queen Creek. |
To reflect communities of interest and town boundaries in the East Valley, concentrating on Gilbert and Queen Creek. I also moved LD15 to west of Gilbert to cover half of Chandler. Changes were made throughout. |
LD0061 | Arizona Competitive and Balanced Legislative Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map creates 9 competitive legislative districts, 7 Latino-VRA districts, 1 Native American-VRA district, and is perfectly balanced from a partisan perspective according to the VRA. This map also seeks to respect urban boundaries to the greatest extent possible. |
Create a map with:-9 competitive legislative districts-7 latino-VRA districts-1 Native American- VRA District-Perfectly balanced in terms of partisanship according to Dave's Redistricting App.-Respects municipal and county boundaries to the greatest extent possible. Most cities are minimized to two splits. |
LD0061 | Arizona Competitive and Balanced Legislative Map Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map creates 9 competitive legislative districts, 7 Latino-VRA districts, 1 Native American-VRA district, and is perfectly balanced from a partisan perspective according to the VRA. This map also seeks to respect urban boundaries to the greatest extent possible. |
Create a map with:-9 competitive legislative districts-7 latino-VRA districts-1 Native American- VRA District-Perfectly balanced in terms of partisanship according to Dave's Redistricting App.-Respects municipal and county boundaries to the greatest extent possible. Most cities are minimized to two splits. |
LD0062 | Brian Bickel LD17 & 18 Self |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan swaps running north south to DMAFB with the Tanque Verde Valley. LD17 is primarily the Catalina Foothills and Casas Adobes. From a COI perspective Tanque Verde Valley is a much better fit for LD18 culturally and economically. LD17 remains a solidly right leaning district, virtually unchanged. |
LD0062 | Brian Bickel LD17 & 18 Self |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan swaps running north south to DMAFB with the Tanque Verde Valley. LD17 is primarily the Catalina Foothills and Casas Adobes. From a COI perspective Tanque Verde Valley is a much better fit for LD18 culturally and economically. LD17 remains a solidly right leaning district, virtually unchanged. |
LD0063 | AFY - LD Proposal 3 Self |
Legislative | Plan showing Gilbert divided into north and south section. Includes Queen Creek which has affinity to Gilbert. Matches boundaries for CD5 in my CD Proposal 2. |
Divides Gilbert into LD13 in the north and LD 14 in the south. Includes Queen Creek, which has affinity to Gilbert, in LD14. Boundaries match my CD Proposal 2. |
LD0063 | AFY - LD Proposal 3 Self |
Legislative | Plan showing Gilbert divided into north and south section. Includes Queen Creek which has affinity to Gilbert. Matches boundaries for CD5 in my CD Proposal 2. |
Divides Gilbert into LD13 in the north and LD 14 in the south. Includes Queen Creek, which has affinity to Gilbert, in LD14. Boundaries match my CD Proposal 2. |
LD0064 | AFY - LD Proposal 4 Self |
Legislative | Splits Gilbert and Queen Creek into E and W districts. Boundaries match those for CD5 in my LD Proposal 2. |
Divides Gilbert into LD13 in the west and LD 14 in the east. Includes Queen Creek, which has affinity to Gilbert, in LD14. Boundaries match my CD Proposal 2. |
LD0064 | AFY - LD Proposal 4 Self |
Legislative | Splits Gilbert and Queen Creek into E and W districts. Boundaries match those for CD5 in my LD Proposal 2. |
Divides Gilbert into LD13 in the west and LD 14 in the east. Includes Queen Creek, which has affinity to Gilbert, in LD14. Boundaries match my CD Proposal 2. |
LD0065 | Brian Bickel LD17 LD18 revision Self |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan adjusts the southern portion of LD18 and orients is to the east which encompasses a much more homogenous COI than the approved draft map. |
LD0065 | Brian Bickel LD17 LD18 revision Self |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan adjusts the southern portion of LD18 and orients is to the east which encompasses a much more homogenous COI than the approved draft map. |
LD0066 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Statewide Communities of Interest Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This submission is the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting's updated Congressional Map submission. This map was created by making adjustment's to the IRC's Draft Congressional Map based on the redistricting criteria in the Arizona Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. |
Uniting Communities of Interest: Apache Junction-Gold Canyon-Santan; removing bits of Florence and Gold Canyon from the 5+ Eastern Counties; Sierra Vista with Suburban Tucson; Williams, Wickenburg, and Sedona with Yavapai; Reservations and like-minded community of Flagstaff joined; and not sacrificing rural Eastern AZ communities to partisan or Urban/Metro interests. |
LD0066 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Statewide Communities of Interest Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This submission is the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting's updated Congressional Map submission. This map was created by making adjustment's to the IRC's Draft Congressional Map based on the redistricting criteria in the Arizona Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. |
Uniting Communities of Interest: Apache Junction-Gold Canyon-Santan; removing bits of Florence and Gold Canyon from the 5+ Eastern Counties; Sierra Vista with Suburban Tucson; Williams, Wickenburg, and Sedona with Yavapai; Reservations and like-minded community of Flagstaff joined; and not sacrificing rural Eastern AZ communities to partisan or Urban/Metro interests. |
LD0067 | SRPMIC10 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) |
Legislative | This modification from the 10/28/21 approved legislative map represents the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's (SRPMIC’s) principles. District 8 was modified to include SRPMIC’s Tribal Lands to the north and extended south to include Mesa Public Schools. A significant number of SRPMIC’s children attend Mesa Public Schools. |
This modification from the 10/28/21 approved legislative map represents the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's (SRPMIC’s) principles. District 8 was modified to include SRPMIC’s Tribal Lands to the north and extended south to include Mesa Public Schools. A significant number of SRPMIC’s children attend Mesa Public Schools. |
LD0067 | SRPMIC10 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) |
Legislative | This modification from the 10/28/21 approved legislative map represents the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's (SRPMIC’s) principles. District 8 was modified to include SRPMIC’s Tribal Lands to the north and extended south to include Mesa Public Schools. A significant number of SRPMIC’s children attend Mesa Public Schools. |
This modification from the 10/28/21 approved legislative map represents the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's (SRPMIC’s) principles. District 8 was modified to include SRPMIC’s Tribal Lands to the north and extended south to include Mesa Public Schools. A significant number of SRPMIC’s children attend Mesa Public Schools. |
LD0068 | Pascua Yaqui Tribe - Legislative Draft Map Pascua Yaqui Tribe |
Legislative | : This is the submitted map of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe with communities in Pima, Pinal and Maricopa Counties. Please see the submitted comments by Chairman Peter Yucupicio. |
This legislative draft map expresses the goals of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, particularly regarding Legislative Districts 20 and 16. Please see the submitted letter of Chairman Peter Yucupicio for further explanation. |
LD0068 | Pascua Yaqui Tribe - Legislative Draft Map Pascua Yaqui Tribe |
Legislative | : This is the submitted map of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe with communities in Pima, Pinal and Maricopa Counties. Please see the submitted comments by Chairman Peter Yucupicio. |
This legislative draft map expresses the goals of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, particularly regarding Legislative Districts 20 and 16. Please see the submitted letter of Chairman Peter Yucupicio for further explanation. |
LD0069 | Arizona Latino Coalition Updates from Legislative Draft Map Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative | N/A |
This is an updated proposal from the Latino Coalition made from adjustments to the Approved Draft Legislative Map from the IRC. This plan makes significant improvements to the 7 majority Latino and 1 majority Native American districts. This plan also creates 8 competitive districts, and makes improvements to communities of interest across the state. |
LD0069 | Arizona Latino Coalition Updates from Legislative Draft Map Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative | N/A |
This is an updated proposal from the Latino Coalition made from adjustments to the Approved Draft Legislative Map from the IRC. This plan makes significant improvements to the 7 majority Latino and 1 majority Native American districts. This plan also creates 8 competitive districts, and makes improvements to communities of interest across the state. |
LD0070 | LDFairandCompetitvestatewide Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Makes LD7 competitive and LD6 less packed. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave in LD30. Keeps Nogales and Rio Rico together and Santa Cruz Co undivided. More balanced and now 7 competitive districts. |
Makes LD7 competitive and more compact again, and LD6 less packed. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave for a better COI in LD30. Creates a better balance statewide and a 7th competitive district. Honors Navajo/Hopi and other area Tribes' request to be together. Keeps Nogales and Rio Rico together, Santa Cruz/Apache/Navajo/La Paz/Cochise counties undivided, Gila Bend, Flagstaff, Sedona |
LD0070 | LDFairandCompetitvestatewide Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Makes LD7 competitive and LD6 less packed. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave in LD30. Keeps Nogales and Rio Rico together and Santa Cruz Co undivided. More balanced and now 7 competitive districts. |
Makes LD7 competitive and more compact again, and LD6 less packed. Puts Central Yavapai County with Mohave for a better COI in LD30. Creates a better balance statewide and a 7th competitive district. Honors Navajo/Hopi and other area Tribes' request to be together. Keeps Nogales and Rio Rico together, Santa Cruz/Apache/Navajo/La Paz/Cochise counties undivided, Gila Bend, Flagstaff, Sedona |
LD0071 | Legislative Map Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Based on the original 8 majority-Latino districts submitted by the Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. |
LD0071 | Legislative Map Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Based on the original 8 majority-Latino districts submitted by the Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. |
LD0072 | Legislative Map Version 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Based on the original 8 majority-Latino districts submitted by the Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. |
LD0072 | Legislative Map Version 1 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
Based on the original 8 majority-Latino districts submitted by the Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. |
LD0073 | Shanna Az South AZ logical compact competitive community Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Updated LD map focused on Southern AZ. creeates 2 highly competitive districts, Makes districts more compact removes impassibnle mountain ranges which were used to join far flung areas has NW, N, E, SE S and West districts. Joins most of Tucson mttn community with W Tucson in Dist 16, Joins Vail with SE to create a safe R dist in Pima county Has competitive NW dist 17. Makes Dist 16 more compact |
Improve S AZ LDs |
LD0073 | Shanna Az South AZ logical compact competitive community Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | Updated LD map focused on Southern AZ. creeates 2 highly competitive districts, Makes districts more compact removes impassibnle mountain ranges which were used to join far flung areas has NW, N, E, SE S and West districts. Joins most of Tucson mttn community with W Tucson in Dist 16, Joins Vail with SE to create a safe R dist in Pima county Has competitive NW dist 17. Makes Dist 16 more compact |
Improve S AZ LDs |
LD0074 | West Valley Communities Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map keeps West Valley communities together and improves our VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend, and provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
This map keeps West Valley communities together and improves our VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend, and provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
LD0074 | West Valley Communities Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map keeps West Valley communities together and improves our VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend, and provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
This map keeps West Valley communities together and improves our VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend, and provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
LD0075 | West Valley Communities, version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map keeps West Valley communities together and vastly improves and strengthens the VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend. It also provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
LD0075 | West Valley Communities, version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map keeps West Valley communities together and vastly improves and strengthens the VRA districts. It unites Gila Bend. It also provides a compromise to the Yuma map by providing a larger split in Yuma than the original draft map, but keeps it in the river district. |
LD0076 | Reconciled East Valley Legislative Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan merges Consolidated Gilbert and LD0061, creating an East Valley configuration that keeps Sun Lakes with Chandler, reduces splits in Gilbert and Mesa, and creates more compact districts overall. |
This plan merges Consolidated Gilbert and LD0061, creating an East Valley configuration that keeps Sun Lakes with Chandler, reduces splits in Gilbert and Mesa, and creates more compact districts overall. |
LD0076 | Reconciled East Valley Legislative Plan Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This plan merges Consolidated Gilbert and LD0061, creating an East Valley configuration that keeps Sun Lakes with Chandler, reduces splits in Gilbert and Mesa, and creates more compact districts overall. |
This plan merges Consolidated Gilbert and LD0061, creating an East Valley configuration that keeps Sun Lakes with Chandler, reduces splits in Gilbert and Mesa, and creates more compact districts overall. |
LD0077 | AZ Latino Coalition Legislative 3.0 Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan adjusts the AZ Latino Coalition's Southern AZ districts from its 2.0 maps to incorporate a portion of the Yuma County split in the Yuma Gold legislative map. It also makes adjustments in Tucson to balance population and incorporate elements from Tucson Mayor Romero's letter to the IRC. |
LD0077 | AZ Latino Coalition Legislative 3.0 Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan adjusts the AZ Latino Coalition's Southern AZ districts from its 2.0 maps to incorporate a portion of the Yuma County split in the Yuma Gold legislative map. It also makes adjustments in Tucson to balance population and incorporate elements from Tucson Mayor Romero's letter to the IRC. |
LD0078 | Respecting Scottsdale and Paradise Valley Communities of Interest Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map only makes changes to districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8. Please ignore changes to other districts that were only done for population balancing. |
LD0078 | Respecting Scottsdale and Paradise Valley Communities of Interest Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | N/A |
This map only makes changes to districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8. Please ignore changes to other districts that were only done for population balancing. |
LD0079 | Pima & Pinal LD17 Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan reorganizes LD17 & LD18 and makes LD17 more competitive and removes the Catalina Mountains as a barrier between the north and south portions of the district. |
LD0079 | Pima & Pinal LD17 Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan reorganizes LD17 & LD18 and makes LD17 more competitive and removes the Catalina Mountains as a barrier between the north and south portions of the district. |
LD0080 | Pima only LD17 Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan reorganizes LD17 and brings it totally into Pima County. It makes the district competitive but it leans Republican. |
LD0080 | Pima only LD17 Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
This plan reorganizes LD17 and brings it totally into Pima County. It makes the district competitive but it leans Republican. |
LD0081 | Southern AZ Progress! (based off 12.0) Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map is based of LD 12.0 but balances out population and communities of interest in the Tucson and southern regions. |
PLEASE REVIEW! |
LD0081 | Southern AZ Progress! (based off 12.0) Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | This map is based of LD 12.0 but balances out population and communities of interest in the Tucson and southern regions. |
PLEASE REVIEW! |
LD0082 | Pima Dems Highly Competitive D17 with slight Democratic advantage Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
Oro Valley, Casas Adobes, Catalina, Saddlebrooke, Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth This map modifies Draft Map 10.0 by shifting D18 to the eastern edge of the county, encompassing neighboring communities in East Tucson, as well as Tanque Verde and the Catalina Mountains. The Towns of Marana and Red Rocks are then added into the larger Pinal district of D16, connecting them with similar rural |
LD0082 | Pima Dems Highly Competitive D17 with slight Democratic advantage Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
Oro Valley, Casas Adobes, Catalina, Saddlebrooke, Oracle, San Manuel, Mammoth This map modifies Draft Map 10.0 by shifting D18 to the eastern edge of the county, encompassing neighboring communities in East Tucson, as well as Tanque Verde and the Catalina Mountains. The Towns of Marana and Red Rocks are then added into the larger Pinal district of D16, connecting them with similar rural |
LD0083 | Pima Dems Highly Competitive D17 with slight Republican advantage Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
Picture Rocks, Marana, Oro Valley, Casas Adobes, Catalina This map modifies Draft Map 10.0 by moving more of north and east Tucson into D18, utilizing the intuitive boundary of Campbell Avenue as the dividing line, and solidifying those communities of interest. This map also demonstrates greater respect for the geographic boundary of the Pinal/Pima county line, moving Saddlebrooke out of D17 and |
LD0083 | Pima Dems Highly Competitive D17 with slight Republican advantage Pima County Democratic Party |
Legislative | N/A |
Picture Rocks, Marana, Oro Valley, Casas Adobes, Catalina This map modifies Draft Map 10.0 by moving more of north and east Tucson into D18, utilizing the intuitive boundary of Campbell Avenue as the dividing line, and solidifying those communities of interest. This map also demonstrates greater respect for the geographic boundary of the Pinal/Pima county line, moving Saddlebrooke out of D17 and |
LD0084 | West Valley Coalition Map West Valley Coalition of Mayors and Councilmembers |
Legislative | This map received input from numerous West Valley mayors and city councilmembers. It provides a way to incorporate the "Yuma Gold" plan while providing a population balance in the west valley, without hurting important communities of interest. This map uses municipal boundaries, major highways/roads, and major geographic features (mountains and rivers) to give the west valley an important voice in |
This map received input from numerous West Valley mayors and city councilmembers. It provides a way to incorporate the "Yuma Gold" plan while providing a population balance in the west valley, without hurting important communities of interest. This map uses municipal boundaries, major highways/roads, and major geographic features (such as mountains and rivers) to give the west valley their voice |
LD0084 | West Valley Coalition Map West Valley Coalition of Mayors and Councilmembers |
Legislative | This map received input from numerous West Valley mayors and city councilmembers. It provides a way to incorporate the "Yuma Gold" plan while providing a population balance in the west valley, without hurting important communities of interest. This map uses municipal boundaries, major highways/roads, and major geographic features (mountains and rivers) to give the west valley an important voice in |
This map received input from numerous West Valley mayors and city councilmembers. It provides a way to incorporate the "Yuma Gold" plan while providing a population balance in the west valley, without hurting important communities of interest. This map uses municipal boundaries, major highways/roads, and major geographic features (such as mountains and rivers) to give the west valley their voice |
LD0085 | West Valley Unified West Valley Coalition of Mayors and Councilmembers |
Legislative | This is an updated West Valley Coalition plan that follows municipal boundaries between D28 and D29 as to not split the City of Glendale too many times. This map has received input from city mayors and councilmembers in Yuma, Buckeye, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, and Glendale. It uses major geographic boundaries (mountains and rivers), major roads/highways, and city boundaries. |
This is an updated West Valley Coalition plan that follows municipal boundaries between D28 and D29 as to not split the City of Glendale too many times. This map has received input from city mayors and councilmembers in Yuma, Buckeye, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, and Glendale. It uses major geographic boundaries (mountains and rivers), major roads/highways, and city boundaries. |
LD0085 | West Valley Unified West Valley Coalition of Mayors and Councilmembers |
Legislative | This is an updated West Valley Coalition plan that follows municipal boundaries between D28 and D29 as to not split the City of Glendale too many times. This map has received input from city mayors and councilmembers in Yuma, Buckeye, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, and Glendale. It uses major geographic boundaries (mountains and rivers), major roads/highways, and city boundaries. |
This is an updated West Valley Coalition plan that follows municipal boundaries between D28 and D29 as to not split the City of Glendale too many times. This map has received input from city mayors and councilmembers in Yuma, Buckeye, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, and Glendale. It uses major geographic boundaries (mountains and rivers), major roads/highways, and city boundaries. |
LD0086 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties 3.1 Adjusted Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | The only scenario, the only communities of interest that you have not listened to is the 5 Eastern Counties communities. Every map you produce can be adjusted to accommodate the rural Eastern Communities. |
While the Commission continues to argue over city blocks ad nauseum, and bends over backwards for communities of interest around the state, and the special interest racial/ethnic coalitions, the rural voiceless communities of rural Eastern AZ continue to be ignored. Regardless of which map version, the 5+ Eastern Counties can be reasonably worked in. |
LD0086 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties 3.1 Adjusted Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative | The only scenario, the only communities of interest that you have not listened to is the 5 Eastern Counties communities. Every map you produce can be adjusted to accommodate the rural Eastern Communities. |
While the Commission continues to argue over city blocks ad nauseum, and bends over backwards for communities of interest around the state, and the special interest racial/ethnic coalitions, the rural voiceless communities of rural Eastern AZ continue to be ignored. Regardless of which map version, the 5+ Eastern Counties can be reasonably worked in. |
LDF001 | Crump ld17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | proposed Ld 17 |
I wanted to create a more contiguous district. The area east of I-10 between Ina and Cortaro was the only part of the proposed Ld21 that was east of I-10 and it looked like gerrymandering instead of following any logical sense. |
LDF001 | Crump ld17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | proposed Ld 17 |
I wanted to create a more contiguous district. The area east of I-10 between Ina and Cortaro was the only part of the proposed Ld21 that was east of I-10 and it looked like gerrymandering instead of following any logical sense. |
LDF002 | Liz map LD 17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | legislation map |
N/A |
LDF002 | Liz map LD 17 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | legislation map |
N/A |
LDF003 | LD 1 Yavapai County Plus Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Yavapai County plus Sedona and Wickenburg so communities are not divided. |
Keep Yavapai County together with Sedona and Wickenburg. |
LDF003 | LD 1 Yavapai County Plus Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Yavapai County plus Sedona and Wickenburg so communities are not divided. |
Keep Yavapai County together with Sedona and Wickenburg. |
LDF004 | CaineSD Legislative District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Would be the new LD 17 |
N/A |
LDF004 | CaineSD Legislative District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Would be the new LD 17 |
N/A |
LDF005 | NW AZ leg district Flag-Sedona-VerdeValley Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | A legislative district that keeps Flagstaff with Sedona, Cottonwood, and other Verde Valley communities - excludes Prescott and the Prescott AMA - includes Hualapai and Havasupai reservations. |
his plan unites regions of northern Arizona with similar environments (high elevation, forested), economies (largely dependent on outdoor recreation and tourism), and predominance of federal lands. It unites Flagstaff, Sedona, Verde Valley communities, Strawberry, Pine,Pinetop, and similar regions with predominance of tourism and national forest-dependent economies. The plan stretches to the west |
LDF005 | NW AZ leg district Flag-Sedona-VerdeValley Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | A legislative district that keeps Flagstaff with Sedona, Cottonwood, and other Verde Valley communities - excludes Prescott and the Prescott AMA - includes Hualapai and Havasupai reservations. |
his plan unites regions of northern Arizona with similar environments (high elevation, forested), economies (largely dependent on outdoor recreation and tourism), and predominance of federal lands. It unites Flagstaff, Sedona, Verde Valley communities, Strawberry, Pine,Pinetop, and similar regions with predominance of tourism and national forest-dependent economies. The plan stretches to the west |
LDF006 | Proposed New LD14 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maximizes similar communities of interest representation and meets all 5 criteria in the law without the need for 'competitive districting' based on partisan preferences. |
To provide the commission with a plan that meets all legal district requirements, as described in previously submitted testimony, including: a.) Compliance with section 2 of the voting rights act prohibiting the splitting of minority areas. b.) Equal population in districts. c.) All Districts must be compact and contiguous. d.) All Districts must reflect the Communities of Interest within them. e |
LDF006 | Proposed New LD14 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maximizes similar communities of interest representation and meets all 5 criteria in the law without the need for 'competitive districting' based on partisan preferences. |
To provide the commission with a plan that meets all legal district requirements, as described in previously submitted testimony, including: a.) Compliance with section 2 of the voting rights act prohibiting the splitting of minority areas. b.) Equal population in districts. c.) All Districts must be compact and contiguous. d.) All Districts must reflect the Communities of Interest within them. e |
LDF007 | Balanced LD Map - LD7 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Single district map of LD7, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD7 is designed to provide representation for tribal communities in northern AZ. |
Single district map of LD7, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD7 is designed to provide representation for tribal communities in northern AZ. |
LDF007 | Balanced LD Map - LD7 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Single district map of LD7, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD7 is designed to provide representation for tribal communities in northern AZ. |
Single district map of LD7, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD7 is designed to provide representation for tribal communities in northern AZ. |
LDF008 | Balanced LD Map - LD6 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Single district map of LD6, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a -1% deviation for LD6. |
Single district map of LD6, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a -1% deviation for LD6. |
LDF008 | Balanced LD Map - LD6 Only Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Single district map of LD6, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a -1% deviation for LD6. |
Single district map of LD6, extracted from the full state map titled 'Balanced LD Map - Full state'. LD6 is designed to encompass communities surrounding Flagstaff, Winslow, and the Verde Valley. Both precincts for Williams have been assigned to LD5, resulting in a -1% deviation for LD6. |
LDF009 | LD5 KTB Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maintain community of interest N AZ |
Maintain rural communities of interest |
LDF009 | LD5_KTB Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maintain community of interest N AZ |
Maintain rural communities of interest |
LDF010 | Timothy Schwartz 'LD24' Proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
I want to create a more competitive district that respects our community. Creating the kind of lopsided partisan district that the first iteration produced will encourage our elected officials to ignore the bulk of our population since general elections will be nothing more than a rubber stamp of one party's primary selection. This design is compact, follows 27th Ave, Thomas, and Northern quite |
LDF010 | Timothy Schwartz 'LD24' Proposal Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
I want to create a more competitive district that respects our community. Creating the kind of lopsided partisan district that the first iteration produced will encourage our elected officials to ignore the bulk of our population since general elections will be nothing more than a rubber stamp of one party's primary selection. This design is compact, follows 27th Ave, Thomas, and Northern quite |
LDF011 | Proposed New LD14 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maximizes similar communities of interest representation and meets all 5 criteria in the law without the need for 'competitive districting' based on partisan preferences. |
To provide the commission with a plan that meets all legal district requirements, as described in previously submitted testimony, including: a.) Compliance with section 2 of the voting rights act prohibiting the splitting of minority areas. b.) Equal population in districts. c.) All Districts must be compact and contiguous. d.) All Districts must reflect the Communities of Interest within them. e |
LDF011 | Proposed New LD14 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Maximizes similar communities of interest representation and meets all 5 criteria in the law without the need for 'competitive districting' based on partisan preferences. |
To provide the commission with a plan that meets all legal district requirements, as described in previously submitted testimony, including: a.) Compliance with section 2 of the voting rights act prohibiting the splitting of minority areas. b.) Equal population in districts. c.) All Districts must be compact and contiguous. d.) All Districts must reflect the Communities of Interest within them. e |
LDF012 | Pete Rios Rural Pinal County District None |
Legislative Focused | ||
LDF012 | Pete Rios Rural Pinal County District None |
Legislative Focused | ||
LDF013 | LD District 2 - Phoenix McDowell Rd I-10 Corridor Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF013 | LD District 2 - Phoenix McDowell Rd I-10 Corridor Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF014 | LD District 3 - Alhambra and SE Glendale Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF014 | LD District 3 - Alhambra and SE Glendale Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF015 | LD District 4 - Maryvale, Glendale, Litchfield Park Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF015 | LD District 4 - Maryvale, Glendale, Litchfield Park Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF016 | LD District 5 - West Valley and Gila Bend Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF016 | LD District 5 - West Valley and Gila Bend Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF017 | LD District 6 - South County Yuma, Tohono O'odham, and Flowing Wells Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF017 | LD District 6 - South County Yuma, Tohono O'odham, and Flowing Wells Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF018 | LD District 7 - South and West Tucson Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF018 | LD District 7 - South and West Tucson Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF019 | LD District 8 - Tucson, Santa Cruz County, Douglas Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF019 | LD District 8 - Tucson, Santa Cruz County, Douglas Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF020 | LD District 1 - South Mountain - Laveen Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF020 | LD District 1 - South Mountain - Laveen Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting |
Legislative Focused | This legislative map is a submission of the Arizona Latino Coalition for Fair Redistricting. It contains one of eight VRA-compliant legislative districts that achieve a majority Hispanic Voting Age Population, protect communities of interest, and give the Latino community the ability to elect a candidate of their choosing in each district. |
Of the eight legislative districts, five are in Maricopa County, and three of the districts are based in Southern Arizona. All eight districts have a population deviation under 5% from the ideal, comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, are contiguous and as compact as possible, while also keeping together significant communities of interest and incorporating visible geographic |
LDF021 | LD17 Oro Valley Casas Adobes Foothills Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan combines Oro Valley, Casas Adobes and the Catalina Foothills that is compact and competitive and eliminates the natural barrier of the Sabino Canyon on the east side. The last two test maps split Oro Valley and this plan avoids that also. You could take the plan all the way to the county line without any population impact as few, if anyone, lives in that precinct. |
LDF021 | LD17 Oro Valley Casas Adobes Foothills Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan combines Oro Valley, Casas Adobes and the Catalina Foothills that is compact and competitive and eliminates the natural barrier of the Sabino Canyon on the east side. The last two test maps split Oro Valley and this plan avoids that also. You could take the plan all the way to the county line without any population impact as few, if anyone, lives in that precinct. |
LDF022 | LD18 competitive Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This map spreads the district to address the east west migration pattern from the Tanque Verde area into Tucson. This is the more natural migration pattern rather than north south along the Houghton corridor. |
LDF022 | LD18 competitive Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This map spreads the district to address the east west migration pattern from the Tanque Verde area into Tucson. This is the more natural migration pattern rather than north south along the Houghton corridor. |
LDF023 | CD 6 Extension 10-18-21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Extends the west boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley all the way south to the border. |
West boundary of CD6 is moved to the east to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley down to the border. Patagonia is NOT included. |
LDF023 | CD 6 Extension 10-18-21 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Extends the west boundary to the west to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley all the way south to the border. |
West boundary of CD6 is moved to the east to encompass Sonoita, Elgin, Canelo and the San Raphael Valley down to the border. Patagonia is NOT included. |
LDF024 | East Valley Legislative District 1 - Kyrene Based Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact Kyrene-based district. This district does not absorb any part of the Chandler Unified School District. |
LDF024 | East Valley Legislative District 1 - Kyrene Based Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact Kyrene-based district. This district does not absorb any part of the Chandler Unified School District. |
LDF025 | East Valley Arizona Legislative District 2 - Chandler Based District Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact and extremely competitive Chandler-based district. This district is entirely located in the City of Chandler and is meant to provide the Chandler COI representation. |
LDF025 | East Valley Arizona Legislative District 2 - Chandler Based District Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact and extremely competitive Chandler-based district. This district is entirely located in the City of Chandler and is meant to provide the Chandler COI representation. |
LDF026 | East Valley Legislative District 3 - Gilbert Based District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact and potentially competitive district in Gilbert. This district is entirely located in Gilbert and is meant to give the Gilbert COI representation. |
LDF026 | East Valley Legislative District 3 - Gilbert Based District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact and potentially competitive district in Gilbert. This district is entirely located in Gilbert and is meant to give the Gilbert COI representation. |
LDF027 | East Valley Legislative District 4 - Central Mesa Based Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a highly competitive Mesa-based district along the light rail line. This district unifies Latino and Asian communities in southwest Mesa as well as communities along main st. |
LDF027 | East Valley Legislative District 4 - Central Mesa Based Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a highly competitive Mesa-based district along the light rail line. This district unifies Latino and Asian communities in southwest Mesa as well as communities along main st. |
LDF028 | North Tempe - South Scottsdale Based District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district based in North Tempe and South Scottsdale. This covers a rapidly urbanizing part of the valley and preserves a light rail transportation corridor. |
LDF028 | North Tempe - South Scottsdale Based District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district based in North Tempe and South Scottsdale. This covers a rapidly urbanizing part of the valley and preserves a light rail transportation corridor. |
LDF029 | Marana Oro Valley Casas Adobes Catalina Foothills Self |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan keeps Marana & Oro Valley together, completely, not just the northern half, and eliminates the need to cross the mountains to get from one side of the district to the other. The east side of the district ends at Sabino Canyon which you cannot cross unless you go south to Tanque Verde Road. It keeps the Amphi (Oro Valley) and Marana school districts whole. This district replaces D17 in LD |
LDF029 | Marana Oro Valley Casas Adobes Catalina Foothills Self |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan keeps Marana & Oro Valley together, completely, not just the northern half, and eliminates the need to cross the mountains to get from one side of the district to the other. The east side of the district ends at Sabino Canyon which you cannot cross unless you go south to Tanque Verde Road. It keeps the Amphi (Oro Valley) and Marana school districts whole. This district replaces D17 in LD |
LDF030 | Navajo Nation Legislative District 7 Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This map attempts to illustrate even getting to -7.05% deviation can get you close to 60% NAVAP but not quite the 63% NAVAP. Navajo Nation specified that there is special circumstances involving the potential to retrogress in LD7. To make the effort to get as close to 63% NAVAP, AIRC needs to go below the -5% deviation. Navajo Nation has submitted legislative districts in New Mexico that are close |
This map attempts to illustrate even getting to -7.05% deviation can get you close to 60% NAVAP but not quite the 63% NAVAP. Navajo Nation specified that there is special circumstances involving the potential to retrogress in LD7. To make the effort to get as close to 63% NAVAP, AIRC needs to go below the -5% deviation. Navajo Nation has submitted legislative districts in New Mexico that are close |
LDF030 | Navajo Nation Legislative District 7 Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This map attempts to illustrate even getting to -7.05% deviation can get you close to 60% NAVAP but not quite the 63% NAVAP. Navajo Nation specified that there is special circumstances involving the potential to retrogress in LD7. To make the effort to get as close to 63% NAVAP, AIRC needs to go below the -5% deviation. Navajo Nation has submitted legislative districts in New Mexico that are close |
This map attempts to illustrate even getting to -7.05% deviation can get you close to 60% NAVAP but not quite the 63% NAVAP. Navajo Nation specified that there is special circumstances involving the potential to retrogress in LD7. To make the effort to get as close to 63% NAVAP, AIRC needs to go below the -5% deviation. Navajo Nation has submitted legislative districts in New Mexico that are close |
LDF031 | Southern Arizona Legislative Districts Self |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan puts ALL of Marana and Oro Valley in one district along with Casas Adobes and the Catalina Foothills. It is presented as an alternative to LD Test Map 8.0. The deviation numbers do not display correctly because the focus map was not designed to handle more than one district. |
LDF031 | Southern Arizona Legislative Districts Self |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
This plan puts ALL of Marana and Oro Valley in one district along with Casas Adobes and the Catalina Foothills. It is presented as an alternative to LD Test Map 8.0. The deviation numbers do not display correctly because the focus map was not designed to handle more than one district. |
LDF032 | Kyrene-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact district around Kyrene Schools and unify retiree communities in the East Valley |
LDF032 | Kyrene-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a compact district around Kyrene Schools and unify retiree communities in the East Valley |
LDF033 | East Mesa Mormon Based District Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district in East Mesa which encompasses the Mormon community. |
LDF033 | East Mesa Mormon Based District Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district in East Mesa which encompasses the Mormon community. |
LDF034 | Chandler-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a Chandler-based legislative district. |
LDF034 | Chandler-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a Chandler-based legislative district. |
LDF035 | Gilbert-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a Gilbert-based legislative district. |
LDF035 | Gilbert-Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a Gilbert-based legislative district. |
LDF036 | West Mesa Transportation Corridor District Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district that encompasses the West Mesa transportation corridor. |
LDF036 | West Mesa Transportation Corridor District Version 2 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a district that encompasses the West Mesa transportation corridor. |
LDF037 | North Tempe - South Scottsdale Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a North Tempe - South Scottsdale district which encompasses rapidly urbanizing parts along the Salt River corridor. |
LDF037 | North Tempe - South Scottsdale Based District Version 2 Neighbors Forward Arizona |
Legislative Focused | N/A |
Create a North Tempe - South Scottsdale district which encompasses rapidly urbanizing parts along the Salt River corridor. |
LDF038 | Flagstaff Navajo Tweak Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF038 | Flagstaff Navajo Tweak Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF039 | NNHRC 7.05 deviation Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF039 | NNHRC 7.05 deviation Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF040 | Navajo Nation LD7 Negative 14.83 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 5 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
The shapefiles in this email is the -14.83% percent deviation to determine at which deviation will the district reach 63% Native American Voting Age Population ("NAVAP"); 63% NAVAP is the current LD7 2012 NAVAP percentage. |
LDF040 | Navajo Nation LD7 Negative 14.83 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 5 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
The shapefiles in this email is the -14.83% percent deviation to determine at which deviation will the district reach 63% Native American Voting Age Population ("NAVAP"); 63% NAVAP is the current LD7 2012 NAVAP percentage. |
LDF041 | AIRC 6.1 Navajo Tweak Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 3 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF041 | AIRC 6.1 Navajo Tweak Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 3 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF042 | NNHRC with Yavapai Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 3 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF042 | NNHRC with Yavapai Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 3 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF043 | Navajo Plan C Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 6 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF043 | Navajo Plan C Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Submitted by Navajo Nation. *This plan was submitted with 6 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation |
LDF044 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties United with Apache Nations Version A Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is version A of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. The 5 Rural Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache Co.s; the copper corridor, Verde Valley, including San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations. Version B will exclude Apache Nations, allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. |
Our rural citizens transcend partisan and demographic lines to support returning our rural voice to the Legislature. We call on you to undo the injury put on us in 2011.Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations. Version B will join them with the Navajo and Hopi. The Apache govt.s will decide for themselves.5+ Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache |
LDF044 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties United with Apache Nations Version A Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is version A of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. The 5 Rural Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache Co.s; the copper corridor, Verde Valley, including San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations. Version B will exclude Apache Nations, allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. |
Our rural citizens transcend partisan and demographic lines to support returning our rural voice to the Legislature. We call on you to undo the injury put on us in 2011.Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations. Version B will join them with the Navajo and Hopi. The Apache govt.s will decide for themselves.5+ Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache |
LDF045 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Reservations Combined Version B Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is Version B of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. The 5 Rural Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache Co.s; the Copper Corridor, Verde Valley. Version B excludes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. Version A includes the Apache Nations with Eastern Arizona. |
Our rural citizens transcend partisan and demographic lines to support returning our rural voice to the Legislature. We call on you to undo the injury put on us in 2011. Version B excludes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations, leaving them to join the Navajo and Hopi, if that is their desire. Version A joins them with Eastern AZ. The Apache govt.s will decide for themselves. 5+ Eastern |
LDF045 | 5 Plus Eastern Counties Reservations Combined Version B Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is Version B of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. The 5 Rural Eastern Counties: Graham, Greenlee, Gila, southern Navajo and Apache Co.s; the Copper Corridor, Verde Valley. Version B excludes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. Version A includes the Apache Nations with Eastern Arizona. |
Our rural citizens transcend partisan and demographic lines to support returning our rural voice to the Legislature. We call on you to undo the injury put on us in 2011. Version B excludes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache nations, leaving them to join the Navajo and Hopi, if that is their desire. Version A joins them with Eastern AZ. The Apache govt.s will decide for themselves. 5+ Eastern |
LDF046 | Reservations Combined cutout of the 5 Plus Eastern Counties Version B Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is Version B of the Reservations Cobined, the cutout of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. This accommodates the American Indian district along with a Rural Eastern AZ District. Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations in Eastern AZ allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. |
This the cutout Version B of a scenario that represents an accommodation for both the American Indian Dist and the 5+ Eastern Counties. Here the Navajo, Hopi, San Carlos and White Mt. Apache, and neighboring reservations are united. Flagstaff and Sedona are culturally agreeable to such a combination. The 5+ Eastern Counties district which unites Rural AZ can still be accomplished under this |
LDF046 | Reservations Combined cutout of the 5 Plus Eastern Counties Version B Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This is Version B of the Reservations Cobined, the cutout of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. This accommodates the American Indian district along with a Rural Eastern AZ District. Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations in Eastern AZ allowing for each Apache govt to represent their interests. |
This the cutout Version B of a scenario that represents an accommodation for both the American Indian Dist and the 5+ Eastern Counties. Here the Navajo, Hopi, San Carlos and White Mt. Apache, and neighboring reservations are united. Flagstaff and Sedona are culturally agreeable to such a combination. The 5+ Eastern Counties district which unites Rural AZ can still be accomplished under this |
LDF047 | Northern AZ United cutout of the 5 Eastern Counties Version A Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This the cutout Version A of a scenario that represents an accommodation for both the Northern AZ and the 5+ Eastern Counties. Here the Navajo, Hopi, and neighboring reservations are united, should the San Carlos and White Mt Apaches choose to remain with Eastern AZ. Flagstaff and Sedona are culturally agreeable to such a combination. The 5+ Eastern Counties district which unites Rural AZ can |
This is Version A of the Reservations Combined, the cutout of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. This accommodates the American Indian district along with a Rural Eastern AZ District. Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations in Eastern AZ if the Apache govts decide that will represent their interests. Version B combines the Apache with the Navajo and Hopi. |
LDF047 | Northern AZ United cutout of the 5 Eastern Counties Version A Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This the cutout Version A of a scenario that represents an accommodation for both the Northern AZ and the 5+ Eastern Counties. Here the Navajo, Hopi, and neighboring reservations are united, should the San Carlos and White Mt Apaches choose to remain with Eastern AZ. Flagstaff and Sedona are culturally agreeable to such a combination. The 5+ Eastern Counties district which unites Rural AZ can |
This is Version A of the Reservations Combined, the cutout of the 5+ Eastern Counties Plan. This accommodates the American Indian district along with a Rural Eastern AZ District. Version A includes the San Carlos and White Mt. Apache Nations in Eastern AZ if the Apache govts decide that will represent their interests. Version B combines the Apache with the Navajo and Hopi. |
LDF048 | Navajo Nation Alternative Legislative District Plan Negative 5.32 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Navajo Nation alternative legislative district plan. The plan has -5.32% deviation with 57.29% NAVAP. *This plan was submitted with 6 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation. |
LDF048 | Navajo Nation Alternative Legislative District Plan Negative 5.32 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | Navajo Nation alternative legislative district plan. The plan has -5.32% deviation with 57.29% NAVAP. *This plan was submitted with 6 non-contiguous parts. The plan has been corrected, allowing it to pass all integrity checks and be submitted. |
Submitted by Navajo Nation. |
LDF049 | Keep Scottsdale and SRPMIC - one LD None |
Legislative Focused | Legislative District representing the interwoven economic and regional interests of the majority of Scottsdale with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community. Compact and far more balanced than 2011 LDs 23, 24 and 26, also the Final-Draft LDs. |
Legislative District representing the interwoven economic and regional interests of the majority of Scottsdale with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community. Compact and far more balanced than 2011 LDs 23, 24 and 26, also the Final-Draft map LDs. In less than 20 years, the economy of Scottsdale and the people of the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community have become inextricably mingled. We |
LDF049 | Keep Scottsdale and SRPMIC - one LD None |
Legislative Focused | Legislative District representing the interwoven economic and regional interests of the majority of Scottsdale with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community. Compact and far more balanced than 2011 LDs 23, 24 and 26, also the Final-Draft LDs. |
Legislative District representing the interwoven economic and regional interests of the majority of Scottsdale with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community. Compact and far more balanced than 2011 LDs 23, 24 and 26, also the Final-Draft map LDs. In less than 20 years, the economy of Scottsdale and the people of the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community have become inextricably mingled. We |
LDF050 | Coconino LD6 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors focused on modifying LD6. |
N/A |
LDF050 | Coconino_LD6 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors focused on modifying LD6. |
N/A |
LDF051 | Coconino LD7 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors focused on modifying LD7. |
N/A |
LDF051 | Coconino_LD7 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors focused on modifying LD7. |
N/A |
LDF052 | East and Northeast Phoenix Community of Interest Legislative District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | East, Northeast Phoenix, Paradise Valley and surrounding Phoenix communities, Desert Ridge, Tatum Ranch, Tatum Corridor, SR 51 corridor. Respects those communities of interest, respects city and town boundaries, respects geographic boundaries with the Arizona Canal in the south, is compact and contiguous, achieves the target population for a legislative district, and falls within the Commission’s |
This community of interest includes east and northeast Phoenix, the town of Paradise Valley, and the Tatum corridor. |
LDF052 | East and Northeast Phoenix Community of Interest Legislative District Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | East, Northeast Phoenix, Paradise Valley and surrounding Phoenix communities, Desert Ridge, Tatum Ranch, Tatum Corridor, SR 51 corridor. Respects those communities of interest, respects city and town boundaries, respects geographic boundaries with the Arizona Canal in the south, is compact and contiguous, achieves the target population for a legislative district, and falls within the Commission’s |
This community of interest includes east and northeast Phoenix, the town of Paradise Valley, and the Tatum corridor. |
LDF053 | Navajo Nation Tweak LD6 AIRC Plan* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on LD6. |
N/A |
LDF053 | Navajo Nation Tweak LD6 AIRC Plan* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on LD6. |
N/A |
LDF054 | Competitive Legislative District 3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This modified LD3 plan for Cave Creek and Carefree environs replaces IRC's Draft Map10.0 LD3. It reflects Cave Creek's and Carefree’s north-south COI orientation along the Cave Creek Rd. and Tatum Blvd. corridors instead of to unrelated communities and wilderness to the east. It takes in portions of SR 51 Piestewa Freeway, is partially bordered on the east by a portion of Scottsdale Rd., on the |
|
LDF054 | Competitive Legislative District 3 Not affiliated with an organization |
Legislative Focused | This modified LD3 plan for Cave Creek and Carefree environs replaces IRC's Draft Map10.0 LD3. It reflects Cave Creek's and Carefree’s north-south COI orientation along the Cave Creek Rd. and Tatum Blvd. corridors instead of to unrelated communities and wilderness to the east. It takes in portions of SR 51 Piestewa Freeway, is partially bordered on the east by a portion of Scottsdale Rd., on the |
|
LDF055 | Navajo Nation LDF 5 20211203 Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD5 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF055 | Navajo_Nation_LDF_5_20211203 Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD5 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF056 | Navajo Nation LDF 6 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD6 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF056 | Navajo Nation LDF 6 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD6 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF057 | Navajo Nation LDF 7 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD7 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF057 | Navajo Nation LDF 7 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD7 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF058 | Navajo Nation LDF 19 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD19 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |
LDF058 | Navajo Nation LDF 19 20211203* Navajo Nation |
Legislative Focused | This plan is submitted on behalf of the Leonard Gorman, Executive Director of Navajo Nation focused on revisions to LD19 provided to IRC on Dec 3, 2021. |
N/A |